- May 6, 2014
- 104
- 19
I was reading another thread and this subject, it got me thinking about a few topics that could be expanded on in one thread.
An installer doesn't face the repercussions of the installation of a surveillance system with regards to neighbors unless called back to modify the installation to appease a neighbor at the end users request regardless of the operators rights. Hopefully an installer will understand local and municipal code, but after the job is done, they walk away. Likely they will not take the time to relay possible queries that could come up after the installation because quite honestly it could cost them the job and or business. As a DIY'er and end user, we have dealt with these type of issues and may be able to afford answers to others in the process. The privacy issue i'm sure has come up with many people. Before I took on my installation I actually probed a good standing neighbor by suggesting the installation of video surveillance beforehand to see how they felt about it.
Has anyone heard of any cases where legal action stemming from the illegal use of surveillance systems where the installer was named as a co-defendant resulting from the improper installation of a surveillance system?
While we have laws that dictate surveillance and their use in public and private places, there are obviously agreements and disagreements to the laws and or their use. Whether you are an installer or simply an advocate of surveillance technology, I anticipate their is less advice provided to appease neighbors who are either mildly or strongly concerned about the use of video surveillance.
Here are some things I have dealt with before, during, or after the installation of video surveillance.
1. Concern by family/friends/guests with regards to video footage outdoors and even more so for indoors. I do not have any cameras indoors and that is usually made clear up front to guests to ease any concern. While I may not have concerns over most guests entering my home, I believe it does send a message of general lacking of trustworthiness to visitors with any installation. The guest may theorize that the home has been vandalized or broken into in the past and may deem the residence/neighborhood unsafe. I'm not someone who likes to be portrayed as paranoid. I do genuinely enjoy having guests and friends visit my home. In general I convey to guests that the installation is more related to my background and a side hobby.
2. Neighbors I do not have a particularly regular or close relationship may approach and ask about cameras. My typical response has been that the installation was in response to an illegal activity that either took place on or near the property. With these neighbors I made sure I had no coverage bleeding into their property beforehand, so that if I was approached with a displeased demeanor, I could explain the coverage and local laws to appease them in order to ward off any escalation leading to the creation of a dispute.
3. Neighbors in good standing or I have a relationship with I tried to approach before the installation and either offer to aim cameras so that there was no coverage of their property or I could mask out any movement on their property. I tried to be proactive with these neighbors as convey the mutual benefit of any overlapping coverage if they opted for it. I found they were mostly open consent in providing coverage on their properties in exchange I would be prepared to provide footage when necessary.
Those of you who have cameras installed indoors at a residence. Has it ever become a point of contention with guests or their comfort level in your home? What have you done to acknowledge concerns over privacy? I assume if you are a hermit you probably could give 2 *&$% about neighbors concerns, but for the rest of the living world, feel free to share your stories.
An installer doesn't face the repercussions of the installation of a surveillance system with regards to neighbors unless called back to modify the installation to appease a neighbor at the end users request regardless of the operators rights. Hopefully an installer will understand local and municipal code, but after the job is done, they walk away. Likely they will not take the time to relay possible queries that could come up after the installation because quite honestly it could cost them the job and or business. As a DIY'er and end user, we have dealt with these type of issues and may be able to afford answers to others in the process. The privacy issue i'm sure has come up with many people. Before I took on my installation I actually probed a good standing neighbor by suggesting the installation of video surveillance beforehand to see how they felt about it.
Has anyone heard of any cases where legal action stemming from the illegal use of surveillance systems where the installer was named as a co-defendant resulting from the improper installation of a surveillance system?
While we have laws that dictate surveillance and their use in public and private places, there are obviously agreements and disagreements to the laws and or their use. Whether you are an installer or simply an advocate of surveillance technology, I anticipate their is less advice provided to appease neighbors who are either mildly or strongly concerned about the use of video surveillance.
Here are some things I have dealt with before, during, or after the installation of video surveillance.
1. Concern by family/friends/guests with regards to video footage outdoors and even more so for indoors. I do not have any cameras indoors and that is usually made clear up front to guests to ease any concern. While I may not have concerns over most guests entering my home, I believe it does send a message of general lacking of trustworthiness to visitors with any installation. The guest may theorize that the home has been vandalized or broken into in the past and may deem the residence/neighborhood unsafe. I'm not someone who likes to be portrayed as paranoid. I do genuinely enjoy having guests and friends visit my home. In general I convey to guests that the installation is more related to my background and a side hobby.
2. Neighbors I do not have a particularly regular or close relationship may approach and ask about cameras. My typical response has been that the installation was in response to an illegal activity that either took place on or near the property. With these neighbors I made sure I had no coverage bleeding into their property beforehand, so that if I was approached with a displeased demeanor, I could explain the coverage and local laws to appease them in order to ward off any escalation leading to the creation of a dispute.
3. Neighbors in good standing or I have a relationship with I tried to approach before the installation and either offer to aim cameras so that there was no coverage of their property or I could mask out any movement on their property. I tried to be proactive with these neighbors as convey the mutual benefit of any overlapping coverage if they opted for it. I found they were mostly open consent in providing coverage on their properties in exchange I would be prepared to provide footage when necessary.
Those of you who have cameras installed indoors at a residence. Has it ever become a point of contention with guests or their comfort level in your home? What have you done to acknowledge concerns over privacy? I assume if you are a hermit you probably could give 2 *&$% about neighbors concerns, but for the rest of the living world, feel free to share your stories.