Thanks all for this site; I found much great information here despite the occasional vitriol. I am working on a six-camera exterior setup for my home (2-front door, 2 back door, and 2 side over-watch) . This is partly a hobby and partly a way to get evidence in case of a break-in.
Before I found this site I started with Reolink IP cameras and a Reolink 8 POE NVR. The day images from these cameras (4-5M) are quite good. But odd things happened with the NVR and PC client setup: it would work one day and crash the next. But it seems OK now after the latest (like last month) firmware updates to the NVR and 5M cameras. These recent, frequent firmware updates may be a good sign that Reolink is fixing things.
My cameras are connected to a POE switch; I don't use the POE ports on Reolink NVR. This gives me PC client/browser access to the cameras and I run both NVRs at the same time.
I found the Reolink images poor for ID at night: they blurred with motion and images were too dark at fast shutter speeds; so I bought a Dahua HDW5442TM-AS from Andy via Amazon. It's too soon to comment on the 5442. At first the Dahua camera had problems working with the Reolink NVR so I bought an Amcrest NV4108-HS which I believe to be very similar to the Dahua model with a similar model number.
At this point, all cameras work OK with both NVRs so I'm fine-tuning as well as trying to decide which NVR I want to use. The Reolink images are brighter and the Amcrest images are more pastel. The user interfaces are different so I need to decide which I dislike least. The smart phone apps for both systems seem to work OK. The Reolink PC client seems more fragile. SmartPSS seems clumsy to use (learning curve issue?) but it has some nice features, like displaying bit rate and resolution when you mouse to the top of an image. One thing I dislike about PSS is the need to log in so frequently, a pain during fine tuning. Maybe there is a way to turn that off but I haven't found it.
I thought both NVRs were very affordable with no hard drive (I had plenty), the Amcrest box (no POE) was less that $100 and the Reolink box (8 POE) was about $150. The guts in these boxes are quite small, like all on one small circuit board. The Amcrest box has a small (40x10mm 2 wire) fan which is louder than my three PCs combined because it runs at 100% all the time. The Reolink box had no fan, which is surprising for a POE box. But I thought it needs a fan, especially if the POE outputs are used, so I installed one (40x20mm 3-wire).
I am pretty low on the learning curve when it comes to FPS, BPS, and resolution. I don't know how they effect NVR CPU loading. For example is lower bitrate/higher compression harder on the NVR or not? It seems that third-party ONVIF cameras do increase NVR CPU loading (vs same brand). But I'm learning.
Before I found this site I started with Reolink IP cameras and a Reolink 8 POE NVR. The day images from these cameras (4-5M) are quite good. But odd things happened with the NVR and PC client setup: it would work one day and crash the next. But it seems OK now after the latest (like last month) firmware updates to the NVR and 5M cameras. These recent, frequent firmware updates may be a good sign that Reolink is fixing things.
My cameras are connected to a POE switch; I don't use the POE ports on Reolink NVR. This gives me PC client/browser access to the cameras and I run both NVRs at the same time.
I found the Reolink images poor for ID at night: they blurred with motion and images were too dark at fast shutter speeds; so I bought a Dahua HDW5442TM-AS from Andy via Amazon. It's too soon to comment on the 5442. At first the Dahua camera had problems working with the Reolink NVR so I bought an Amcrest NV4108-HS which I believe to be very similar to the Dahua model with a similar model number.
At this point, all cameras work OK with both NVRs so I'm fine-tuning as well as trying to decide which NVR I want to use. The Reolink images are brighter and the Amcrest images are more pastel. The user interfaces are different so I need to decide which I dislike least. The smart phone apps for both systems seem to work OK. The Reolink PC client seems more fragile. SmartPSS seems clumsy to use (learning curve issue?) but it has some nice features, like displaying bit rate and resolution when you mouse to the top of an image. One thing I dislike about PSS is the need to log in so frequently, a pain during fine tuning. Maybe there is a way to turn that off but I haven't found it.
I thought both NVRs were very affordable with no hard drive (I had plenty), the Amcrest box (no POE) was less that $100 and the Reolink box (8 POE) was about $150. The guts in these boxes are quite small, like all on one small circuit board. The Amcrest box has a small (40x10mm 2 wire) fan which is louder than my three PCs combined because it runs at 100% all the time. The Reolink box had no fan, which is surprising for a POE box. But I thought it needs a fan, especially if the POE outputs are used, so I installed one (40x20mm 3-wire).
I am pretty low on the learning curve when it comes to FPS, BPS, and resolution. I don't know how they effect NVR CPU loading. For example is lower bitrate/higher compression harder on the NVR or not? It seems that third-party ONVIF cameras do increase NVR CPU loading (vs same brand). But I'm learning.
Last edited: