Pandemic threat? Anyone else concerned?

IP_man

n3wb
Joined
Feb 1, 2020
Messages
16
Reaction score
16
Location
Canada
If you like numbers, below are some sites:
Edits

Please note I'm citing the above sites for people who are interested in looking at the numbers. In particular the seriousness of the situation. Logarithmic graphs are great at showing large and small numbers on a single scale.

If you are unfamiliar with them, and there's interest, I can attach an Excel spreadsheet with 12 data samples. It compares a linear graph against a logarithmic graph of the same data.
 
Last edited:

Arjun

Known around here
Joined
Feb 26, 2017
Messages
9,121
Reaction score
11,169
Location
USA
In the some states, the rate of hospitalization is going down due to one reason. People are beginning to take the issue much more seriously and are adhering to social distancing and stay-at-home orders. The less people go outside, the lower the risk of infection, and in-turn less hospitalizations.

But the problem will not simply disappear. There is still a chance where the number of cases can surge again. Its not a surprise to see that recovered people previously diagnosed with COVID-19 are showing up as positive again. Everyone's immune system varies. The idea of replicating monoclonal antibodies by removing an amount of plasma from recovered patients is actually a brilliant idea. Lets hope this treatment option works and is embraced by other countries' healthcare systems as well. In the meantime, hang on tight, we're all in this together.
 

IP_man

n3wb
Joined
Feb 1, 2020
Messages
16
Reaction score
16
Location
Canada
Its not a surprise to see that recovered people previously diagnosed with COVID-19 are showing up as positive again.
Hi Arjun,

From an NPR article[1]:

Could that second positive test mean a second round of infection? Virologists think it is unlikely that a COVID-19 patient could be re-infected so quickly after recovery but caution that it is too soon to know.
and

It is possible they were first given a false negative test result, which can happen if the swab used to collect samples of the virus misses bits of the virus. Dr. Li Wenliang, a whistleblowing doctor who later died of the virus himself in February, tested negative for the coronavirus several times before being accurately diagnosed.
References
  1. Mystery In Wuhan: Recovered Coronavirus Patients Test Negative ... Then Positive
 

IP_man

n3wb
Joined
Feb 1, 2020
Messages
16
Reaction score
16
Location
Canada
Anyone see the report that up to 70% of the test kits donated by China to Europe are defective and showing false negative results?
Hi,

Do you mean this article? [1] It states that "rapid test kits" are faulty. It is forcing the health workers in Taiwan "to rely on conventional laboratory tests." This article is relatively recent - March 25th, 2020.

There was an issue in the US with some of the original testing kits [2]. Note, this article is very old: Feb 12, 2020. ;)

References
  1. 80% of coronavirus test kits 'gifted'... | Taiwan News
  2. Coronavirus Test Kits Sent to States Are Flawed, C.D.C. Says
 

Arjun

Known around here
Joined
Feb 26, 2017
Messages
9,121
Reaction score
11,169
Location
USA
Yes, at least from what I've come across on the extensive reported by WION News. They have an overwhelming number of videos right now released today ranging discussion from defective testing kits to defective medical equipment to reemerging cases of COVID-19 as well as riots breaking out in Wuhan
Herd Immunity be the ultimate resolution to this already extensive mess

fuQ it, here's the YouTube playlist to WION's Gravitas WION Gravitas

Italy is seeking reparations from China too. This could end up spiraling out of control.

Anyone see the report that up to 70% of the test kits donated by China to Europe are defective and showing false negative results?
 

IP_man

n3wb
Joined
Feb 1, 2020
Messages
16
Reaction score
16
Location
Canada

IP_man

n3wb
Joined
Feb 1, 2020
Messages
16
Reaction score
16
Location
Canada
Attached is the latest US logarithmic death graph[1]. As you can see, deaths are still growing exponentially. :(

deaths-log.png

If you're not familiar with logarithmic graphs, attached is an Excel spreadsheet I created to illustrate the difference between a linear and a logarithmic graph (base 10). If you don't want to download the Excel spreadsheet, below is an image with annotations of what's going on:

linear-vs-log.jpg

References
  1. United States Coronavirus: 158,571 Cases and 2,938 Deaths - Worldometer
 

Attachments

Last edited:

MR2

Getting the hang of it
Joined
Jan 25, 2016
Messages
95
Reaction score
33
anyone able to find the article that was saying a huge number of Alipay or social ID accounts were deleted this month?
 

Sybertiger

Known around here
Joined
Jun 30, 2018
Messages
4,699
Reaction score
13,558
Location
Orlando
Hi,

Do you mean this article? [1] It states that "rapid test kits" are faulty. It is forcing the health workers in Taiwan "to rely on conventional laboratory tests." This article is relatively recent - March 25th, 2020.

There was an issue in the US with some of the original testing kits [2]. Note, this article is very old: Feb 12, 2020. ;)

References
  1. 80% of coronavirus test kits 'gifted'... | Taiwan News
  2. Coronavirus Test Kits Sent to States Are Flawed, C.D.C. Says
Does the "thought" count?
 

Arjun

Known around here
Joined
Feb 26, 2017
Messages
9,121
Reaction score
11,169
Location
USA
Welcome to Globalization. We are "need" each other. We depend on other countries and they depend on US. Although, this pandemic may enable countries to reconsider their manufacturing logistics. Short on ventilators? Well, that's subjective and could have been avoided to begin with. Bill Gates has been warning us of an impending pandemic. He's one of many "experts," they say.

The worrying thing is, a lot of face masks are made in China......
 

Arjun

Known around here
Joined
Feb 26, 2017
Messages
9,121
Reaction score
11,169
Location
USA
Not to be picky, but the article states that COVID-19 has an R0 of about 3, which suggests its closer to 3. However, others report 2-2.5 (about 2.2 which is closer to 2) :confused:
But the article does say as research is rapidly becoming more prevalent, the numbers are changing, so I can't really argue at this point, but I tried (almost contradicted myself there, haha :D )

I still like this article, can't get to reliant over what the majority say regarding herd immunity. Chances are, it may not work, but more needs to be done in respect to computer modelling.

Will Watson will save us? :idk:

An interesting article on herd immunity

 
Last edited:
Top