Association of American Physicians and Surgeons Sues FDA for “Irrational” Interference of Access to Life-Saving Hydroxychloroquine
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (
HOME - AAPS | Association of American Physicians and Surgeons) filed a lawsuit against Department of Health and Human Services and the FDA for “irrational interference” by the FDA with timely access to hydroxychloroquine.
Never in history have we seen such a determined effort by the scientific community and pharmaceutical industry to downplay and lie about the use of a successful drug to treat a deadly disease.
Hydroxychloroquine is the first choice in a study of 6,000 doctors treating the coronavirus. In the field and in independent testing hydroxychloroquine displayed amazing results in treating the COVID-19 virus.
But there was great pushback against hydroxychloroquine for two reasons. The first reason was because it was safe and very inexpensive. The second reason is because Donald Trump promoted its use.
It is not a stretch to say the Democrat establishment would rather see people die than see President Trump be proven right.
So the so-called experts went to great lengths to lie and smear the use of this drug as we have discussed previously.
The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons (https://aapsonline.org) filed a lawsuit against Department of Health and Human Services and the FDA for “irrational interference” by the FDA with timely access to hydroxychloroquine.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
Specifically to your "first choice by 6000 doctors" comment, that was from a survey of doctors in late March/early April, taken when HQ was all the buzz following the bogus "study" showing amazing results that was never replicated ANYWHERE IN THE WORLD. It was just doctors' opinions about what they thought was going to work. Look at the data. 37% said HQ was the most effective. 32% said either "Azithromycin" or "nothing." Again, this is opinions, not data about outcomes. Even then the first choice status was only marginally better than "nothing" or several other options. Two weeks later a follow up study by the same group showed it was no longer in favor.
Those same folks that talk up the first Sermo survey rarely cite the next report in the series, described here:
Hydroxychloroquine No Longer Seen as Most Effective Coronavirus Treatment: Survey
In the first survey, Sermo had promised more phases, and now the second set of numbers is out, taken between March 30 and April 2. The new data shows that while usage of Hydroxychloroquine has expanded globally, it's no longer seen by a plurality of survey participants as the most effective...
nationalinterest.org
Here's an excerpt:
"According to Sermo,
when participants were asked to "rate the efficacy of medications you have used or have seen used to treat COVID-19," 52 percent listed "plasma from patients who have recovered from COVID-19" as "very or extremely effective," followed by Hydroxychloroquine (Plaquenil) or Chloroquine at 38 percent, "non-approved drugs" at 37 percent, Interferon-beta at 36 percent and "traditional Chinese medicine" at 34 percent. '
Interestingly, this survey was done at at time when plasma from recovered patients was a big hot thing. I guarantee you 52% of the survey respondents didn't do valid trials all the way through to completion using plasma. And, HQ is no longer top but still rated around "non approved drugs" and "Traditional Chinese medicine." Not much of an HQ signal there even if the data were believed to represent actual results.
HQ doesn't seem to work, as no decent study showed significant benefit from it, but I'm glad the recent flawed study of aggregated data was picked apart so that proper data analysis of HQ risks can be now done.
I know 20 front line doctors, none are recommending HQ for Covid-19.
Edited 5:36pm 6/15/2020 to add link to report on second SERMO study.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk