Jessie.slimer
BIT Beta Team
Remember when the Governor of NY put all those covid patients in with the nursing home patients? That was some good leadership, right?
Last edited:
Yes. If only it worked like that on both sides though, right?Ah, the power of hindsight.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk
Maybe we need less 50 year politiciansAsking a politician to keep their pie hole shut is like asking the sun not to rise, especially if hey think they can "score a point".
Yeah no shit on the Axios interview that guy Jonathan Swan was/is a mini Acosta. Definitely partisan hack.Don't worry @Oceanslider we don't need a hurricane to get worked up over the spikes. The results from tests are already so delayed that a few days of additional delay won't matter.
But today most of us were too busy giggling at the "Yo-semites" gaff to get overly concerned with hurricane testing delays. This of course set off raging debates over the ethics of laughing at a clearly mentally ill man. That, and still doing Facepalms over the Swan/Axios interview. I'm surprised his handlers allowed that interview to go on as long as it did, or didn't find a way to confiscate the tapes.
It is, what it is...Yeah no shit on the Axios interview that guy Jonathan Swan was/is a mini Acosta. Definitely partisan hack.
I'm afraid I cannot take this article seriously and I'll explain why. Take this statement presented as fact: "Worried about the stock market and his reelection prospects, Trump also feared that more testing would only lead to higher case counts and more bad publicity. " There is no substantiation or attribution for it. It's simply something the author had the opportunity to throw in there because she could. Doesn't matter if it's correct or not, it's falsely presented as a fact. Without the author having heard a statement from Trump, or having somebody willing to go on record as having heard it, the author is throwing in something that doesn't belong there. If it could be substantiated the author should have done that, or otherwise left it out. When I see something like this in an article, I'm left wondering what else is the personal conclusion or wishful thinking of the author.Busy work day today, but here's an article explaining why Jared's national COVID-19 testing plan never materialized:
This is a well-researched and in-depth piece of journalism. The right wing press will try to punch holes in it for sure. But it lines up with public facts nicely and explains things I've seen that are less public.How Jared Kushner’s Secret Testing Plan “Went Poof Into Thin Air”
This spring, a team working under the president’s son-in-law produced a plan for an aggressive, coordinated national COVID-19 response that could have brought the pandemic under control. So why did the White House spike it in favor of a shambolic 50-state response?www.vanityfair.com
I can't think of any source I trust these days