And of course it has nothing to do with blaming everything possible on covid, regardless of its real cause. If Biden really gets ordained on Jan 20, I won't be shocked if all of a sudden flu deaths spike up and covid deaths spike down.
One of the reasons I participate here is because I really do appreciate being exposed to different ways of thinking outside my liberal bubble. I get that there are many different interpretations of things. But sometimes I really can't understand the logic behind the different viewpoints. This flu thing is something that the people I know who are "traditional republicans" totally seem to agree with me on, but the people who are "Trump republicans" come up with weird COVID-19 conspiracies about.
Let me walk through it, step by step, and I ask you to tell me which of these steps you disagree with, so I can learn where our opinions diverge.
1. The flu, as in influenza A and B, is a respiratory virus primarily spread in the air by droplets expelled from the mouth and nose of infected people, and breathed in or taken in via eyes and similar routes in healthy people.
2. Secondary transmission modes of flu include infected droplets landing on things that are later touched by healthy people, who touch their eyes, faces, etc. and get sick that way. Toilet flushes also spread it.
3. Flu spread has been conclusively shown to be dramatically contained by infected people wearing simple cloth masks, which trap many of the infected droplets, reducing spread. It has been common in Asia for people either feeling ill or having any symptoms, or those living with ill folks, to wear masks in public to protect others in the event they may be infected.
4. COVID-19 is a respiratory virus with similar modes of infection as influenza.
5. COVID-19 has been shown to have a substantially higher R value, a measure of it's infectiousness. It takes less exposure to a sick COVID-19 person than one who has influenza to get sick. Initial infectiveness, or R0, has been measured between 2.5 and 3.5 meaning on average one infected person infects something like 3 others before getting better or dying.
6. Masks trap droplets from mouth and nose; you can see this in any number of visualizations and tests. They aren't perfect by any means, but a lot better than nothing.
7. Because masks trap droplets with COVID-19 in them, wearing masks in public reduces spread by infected people who may not know they are spreaders.
8. The flu spreads mostly in places where people are face to face. So does COVID-19. Offices and other workplaces, schools where kids are face to face, churches and stadiums and so forth. The more you are around other people's exhaled breath, including speaking, singing, coughing and sneezing, the more you are at risk. Being outside dilutes the risk somewhat, being trapped inside with poor air systems increases risk.
9. Starting in March, people have been around each other much less this year than in other years, statistically speaking, and when they have been around each other, they've often been wearing masks.
10. Broadly speaking, social distancing measures have reduced "Face to face" time, and thus have reduced BOTH COVID-19 spread and FLU spread.
11. Since the flu is less transmissible than COVID-19, it's easier for its transmission to be significantly reduced. Remember, once R<1, the number of people carrying it starts to drop
12. The flu typically has an R0 (meaning initial infectivity) of around 1.6. COVID-19 is closer to 3. If you cut face to face time in half, flu effective R value drops below 1, and over time fewer people have it. But COVID-19 would still have R value around 1.5, so COVID-19 would be still growing under these conditions... deeper cuts to face time are required to contain it.
13. Measured values of flu prevalence around the country range from 5-10% of usual values this time of year.
14. Since we've been isolating and wearing masks for 9 months now, it's likely the effective R value for flu has been low enough for much of this time that it has been fading away due to social distancing. This is supported by longitudinal data over time.
As somoene who works in the broader health arena and has for decades, none of the above statements seems in any way controversial and all of them can be backed up by very objective research, facts and figures. I would love to know at what point our reasoning diverges.