sebastiantombs
Known around here
Typically the CJ is a separate appointment and not a sitting member of the SC. Roberts was appointed as CJ and hadn't served on the SC previously as an example.
Pandemic threat? Anyone else concerned?
- Thread starter erkme73
- Start date
Yes but Biden did not appoint Jackson as the CJ. She is listed as an AJ.
sebastiantombs
Known around here
Yes, that's because Roberts is the sitting CJ. Until he retires or otherwise leaves that position he will be the CJ. Then it will be up to the President, whoever it may be when that happens, to appoint a new CJ. There is only one CJ and that seat is occupied.
Right, but he is retiring. That is why Jackson was nominated and approved.
That was for Breyer retiring, not Roberts.
Duh, what a dummy. I got that so wrong. Forget everything I said above. Never mind. I think I will go over to the satire thread and laugh a little.
BORIStheBLADE
Getting comfortable
bigredfish
Known around here
Hadn't seen it but you would think at some point the Covidian clot shot cult would begin to notice.... 
bigredfish
Known around here
Oceanslider
Known around here
Smilingreen
Known around here
Oceanslider
Known around here
They won't do these types of studies in the USA, why? There is a narrative to maintain: "it is extremely bad, you must get multiple shots!"
Ssayer
BIT Beta Team
Fauci: Covid Restrictions Should Have Been ‘Much, Much More Stringent’
Fauci said that he would have recommended 'much, much more stringent restrictions' during the spring of 2020.
Sure, we should have been on lockdown since the beginning of time. Perhaps we wouldn't be talking about an energy crisis 
Fauci: Covid Restrictions Should Have Been ‘Much, Much More Stringent’
Fauci said that he would have recommended 'much, much more stringent restrictions' during the spring of 2020.www.yahoo.com