Pandemic threat? Anyone else concerned?
- Thread starter erkme73
- Start date
Just think I could of saved them all that time and money and told them this from personal experience. No One Listens To MeMy surprised face
With Velcro Shoes you slip your feet in, use one foot kick down the Velcro strap(s), then do the same for the other foot, no bending needed LOL
After a long day of chasing all the Senior Ladies around the Mall, kick them off at the end of the day.
Fake news again, from the NIH website...
Ivermectin
Last Updated: April 29, 2022
Ivermectin is a Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved antiparasitic drug used to treat several neglected tropical diseases, including onchocerciasis, helminthiases, and scabies.1 For these indications, ivermectin has been widely used and is generally well-tolerated.1,2 Ivermectin is not approved by the FDA for the treatment of any viral infection.
bigredfish
Known around here
Correct, its not "approved"
And conversely I dont "approve" of the FDA.
It IS however "approved" by real doctors, not the kind that write bullshit political documents and press releases for the FDA.
And conversely I dont "approve" of the FDA.
It IS however "approved" by real doctors, not the kind that write bullshit political documents and press releases for the FDA.
Quoted directly from one of the NIH links above: (Review of the Emerging Evidence Demonstrating the Efficacy of Ivermectin in the Prophylaxis and Treatment of COVID-19)
Conclusions:
Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.
But hey, wait for your FuckedDelusionalAdministration approval....
Conclusions:
Meta-analyses based on 18 randomized controlled treatment trials of ivermectin in COVID-19 have found large, statistically significant reductions in mortality, time to clinical recovery, and time to viral clearance. Furthermore, results from numerous controlled prophylaxis trials report significantly reduced risks of contracting COVID-19 with the regular use of ivermectin. Finally, the many examples of ivermectin distribution campaigns leading to rapid population-wide decreases in morbidity and mortality indicate that an oral agent effective in all phases of COVID-19 has been identified.
But hey, wait for your FuckedDelusionalAdministration approval....
Smilingreen
Known around here
There is a new pandemic about to start in the US, just in time for elections.......but only for Californians....
www.theepochtimes.com
Mask Up, Berkeley Students
www.theepochtimes.com
they played POLITICS with TREATMENT and KILLED PEOPLE.Just think I could of saved them all that time and money and told them this from personal experience. No One Listens To Me
Just published-- 88,012 cases in this research:
Regular Use of Ivermectin as Prophylaxis for COVID-19 Led Up to a 92% Reduction in COVID-19 Mortality Rate in a Dose-Response Manner: Results of a Prospective Observational Study of a Strictly Controlled Population of 88,012 Subjects
Background We have previously demonstrated that ivermectin used as prophylaxis for coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), irrespective of the regularity, in a strictly controlled citywide program in Southern Brazil (Itajaí, Brazil), was associated with reductions in COVID-19 infection...
www.cureus.com
bigredfish
Known around here
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Huge proof that it works and that our Government, and many others, have been lying about it for over 2 years
Original article
peer-reviewed
https://www.cureus.com/articles/111851-regular-use-of-ivermectin-as-prophylaxis-for-covid-19-led-up-to-a-92-reduction-in-covid-19-mortality-rate-in-a-dose-response-manner-results-of-a-prospective-observational-study-of-a-strictly-controlled-population-of-88012-subjects
Conclusions
The regular use of ivermectin decreased hospitalization for COVID-19 by 100%, mortality by 92%, and the risk of dying from COVID-19 by 86% when compared to non-users.
Protection from COVID-19-related outcomes was observed across all levels of ivermectin use, with a notable reduction in risk of death in the over 50-year-old population and those with comorbidities. The reduction in infection rate was significant, irrespective of the level of ivermectin use. The results of this prospective observational study of a strictly controlled population of 223,128 participants reinforce the efficacy of ivermectin and the demonstration of a dose-response effect.
Where's @Frankenscript when you want to flog him?
Results
Among 223,128 subjects from the city of Itajaí, 159,560 were 18 years old or up and were not infected by COVID-19 until July 7, 2020, from which 45,716 (28.7%) did not use and 113,844 (71.3%) used ivermectin. Among ivermectin users, 33,971 (29.8%) used irregularly (up to 60 mg) and 8,325 (7.3%) used regularly (more than 180 mg). The remaining 71,548 participants were not included in the analysis. COVID-19 infection rate was 49% lower for regular users (3.40%) than non-users (6.64%) (risk rate (RR): 0.51; 95% CI: 0.45-0.58; p < 0.0001), and 25% lower than irregular users (4.54%) (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.66-0.85; p < 0.0001). The infection rate was 32% lower for irregular users than non-users (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.64-0.73; p < 0.0001). Among COVID-19 participants, regular users were older and had a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes and hypertension than irregular and non-users. After PSM, the matched analysis contained 283 subjects in each group of non-users and regular users, between regular users and irregular users, and 1,542 subjects between non-users and irregular users. The hospitalization rate was reduced by 100% in regular users compared to both irregular users and non-users (p < 0.0001), and by 29% among irregular users compared to non-users (RR: 0.781; 95% CI: 0.49-1.05; p = 0.099). Mortality rate was 92% lower in regular users than non-users (RR: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.02-0.35; p = 0.0008) and 84% lower than irregular users (RR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.04-0.71; p = 0.016), while irregular users had a 37% lower mortality rate reduction than non-users (RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.40-0.99; p = 0.049). Risk of dying from COVID-19 was 86% lower among regular users than non-users (RR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.03-0.57; p = 0.006), and 72% lower than irregular users (RR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.07-1.18; p = 0.083), while irregular users had a 51% reduction compared to non-users (RR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.32-0.76; p = 0.001).
Conclusion
Non-use of ivermectin was associated with a 12.5-fold increase in mortality rate and a seven-fold increased risk of dying from COVID-19 compared to the regular use of ivermectin. This dose-response efficacy reinforces the prophylactic effects of ivermectin against COVID-19.
Huge proof that it works and that our Government, and many others, have been lying about it for over 2 years
Original article
peer-reviewed
https://www.cureus.com/articles/111851-regular-use-of-ivermectin-as-prophylaxis-for-covid-19-led-up-to-a-92-reduction-in-covid-19-mortality-rate-in-a-dose-response-manner-results-of-a-prospective-observational-study-of-a-strictly-controlled-population-of-88012-subjects
Conclusions
The regular use of ivermectin decreased hospitalization for COVID-19 by 100%, mortality by 92%, and the risk of dying from COVID-19 by 86% when compared to non-users.
Protection from COVID-19-related outcomes was observed across all levels of ivermectin use, with a notable reduction in risk of death in the over 50-year-old population and those with comorbidities. The reduction in infection rate was significant, irrespective of the level of ivermectin use. The results of this prospective observational study of a strictly controlled population of 223,128 participants reinforce the efficacy of ivermectin and the demonstration of a dose-response effect.
Where's @Frankenscript when you want to flog him?
Results
Among 223,128 subjects from the city of Itajaí, 159,560 were 18 years old or up and were not infected by COVID-19 until July 7, 2020, from which 45,716 (28.7%) did not use and 113,844 (71.3%) used ivermectin. Among ivermectin users, 33,971 (29.8%) used irregularly (up to 60 mg) and 8,325 (7.3%) used regularly (more than 180 mg). The remaining 71,548 participants were not included in the analysis. COVID-19 infection rate was 49% lower for regular users (3.40%) than non-users (6.64%) (risk rate (RR): 0.51; 95% CI: 0.45-0.58; p < 0.0001), and 25% lower than irregular users (4.54%) (RR: 0.75; 95% CI: 0.66-0.85; p < 0.0001). The infection rate was 32% lower for irregular users than non-users (RR: 0.68; 95% CI: 0.64-0.73; p < 0.0001). Among COVID-19 participants, regular users were older and had a higher prevalence of type 2 diabetes and hypertension than irregular and non-users. After PSM, the matched analysis contained 283 subjects in each group of non-users and regular users, between regular users and irregular users, and 1,542 subjects between non-users and irregular users. The hospitalization rate was reduced by 100% in regular users compared to both irregular users and non-users (p < 0.0001), and by 29% among irregular users compared to non-users (RR: 0.781; 95% CI: 0.49-1.05; p = 0.099). Mortality rate was 92% lower in regular users than non-users (RR: 0.08; 95% CI: 0.02-0.35; p = 0.0008) and 84% lower than irregular users (RR: 0.16; 95% CI: 0.04-0.71; p = 0.016), while irregular users had a 37% lower mortality rate reduction than non-users (RR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.40-0.99; p = 0.049). Risk of dying from COVID-19 was 86% lower among regular users than non-users (RR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.03-0.57; p = 0.006), and 72% lower than irregular users (RR: 0.28; 95% CI: 0.07-1.18; p = 0.083), while irregular users had a 51% reduction compared to non-users (RR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.32-0.76; p = 0.001).
Conclusion
Non-use of ivermectin was associated with a 12.5-fold increase in mortality rate and a seven-fold increased risk of dying from COVID-19 compared to the regular use of ivermectin. This dose-response efficacy reinforces the prophylactic effects of ivermectin against COVID-19.
Last edited:
bigredfish
Known around here
Im still trying to read through the study on dosage....
Looks like
"This exploratory analysis of a prospective observational study involved a program that used ivermectin at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day for two consecutive days, every 15 days, for 150 days. Regularity definitions were as follows: regular users had 180 mg or more of ivermectin and irregular users had up to 60 mg, in total, throughout the program. "
I've been taking 12-18mg every week once a week. Which according to the table is about right (16mg) I have 6mg pills. Never got the WuFlu
The latest updated FLCCC protocol calls for
Ivermectin: 0.2 mg/kg – start treatment with one dose, take second dose 48 hours later, then 1 dose every 7 days (weekly).
Those at high risk of contracting COVID-19 can consider dosing twice a week. See Table 1 for help with calculating correct dose.
*Due to a possible interaction between quercetin and ivermectin, these drugs should be staggered throughout the
day. For COVID treatment, ivermectin is best taken with a meal or just following a meal, for greater absorption.
* For those following the FLCCC protocol, make note of the possible interaction with quercetin
Looks like
"This exploratory analysis of a prospective observational study involved a program that used ivermectin at a dose of 0.2 mg/kg/day for two consecutive days, every 15 days, for 150 days. Regularity definitions were as follows: regular users had 180 mg or more of ivermectin and irregular users had up to 60 mg, in total, throughout the program. "
I've been taking 12-18mg every week once a week. Which according to the table is about right (16mg) I have 6mg pills. Never got the WuFlu
The latest updated FLCCC protocol calls for
Ivermectin: 0.2 mg/kg – start treatment with one dose, take second dose 48 hours later, then 1 dose every 7 days (weekly).
Those at high risk of contracting COVID-19 can consider dosing twice a week. See Table 1 for help with calculating correct dose.
*Due to a possible interaction between quercetin and ivermectin, these drugs should be staggered throughout the
day. For COVID treatment, ivermectin is best taken with a meal or just following a meal, for greater absorption.
* For those following the FLCCC protocol, make note of the possible interaction with quercetin
Last edited:
bigredfish
Known around here
People should fucking Hang on Live PPV TV for this
sebastiantombs
Known around here
No, not on live PPV, live on free commercial TV. Everyone should see justice, and retribution, occur with this. Failure to do that makes it a weak lesson.
bigredfish
Known around here
(Shhhh I was working on the broadcast ppv rights ..)
Correct you are sir!
Correct you are sir!
any of these types of viruses that is doing that is concentrated artificially in one area only and people who catch it with a bio-hazard type 3 concentration is going to spread it as its natural bio-hazard state: type 2
Type 2 bio-hazard protocols should have been deployed.
This means you should clean all surfaces you touch, wash your hands coming back from public places, cleaning and washing off products you buy, including washing clothing. Cleaning the house, the floors, switch plates door handles, even the doors and door jams. In the car: steering wheel dash boards, shifters, cup holders door handles inside and out. Cleaning the fridge regularly. Cleaning your keyboard, mouse, monitor and desk at least weekly.
Type 2 usually have bacteria 'friends' it likes to coexist in a eco-sphere that knocks down the immune system of the victim so the virus can be opportunistic. They may or may not be present side by side in a field sample. But their partner usually comes in contaminated food and water. So for those people that are taking Ivermectin, yes, most likely you are not going to get covid, but that is because it is eliminating the bacterium that infects that lowers the immune system.
Does people need to take that? No.
Distilling water and using distilled water when cooking, washing/rinsing raw produce and repackaging them in new bags or containers if they came in them is needed. Boiling water does work for the most part. But they can be chemical based pathogens in city water supplies that can lower the immune system. A friend of mine who retired from Bayer and worked before for Monsanto moved to an area here because the water was one of the best sources on the planet. Now, she is drinking distilled water and anyone that goes visit her at her house drinks everything made from distilled water now. Even the water she uses for her garden is triple filtered. At first I thought she was a little paranoid, but after vising her and her little biochemistry lab she set up to test independently the water instead on relying on store bought tests or sending a sample out to a lab, I know why.
Pandemic response is mostly teaching others how to live healthier lives to prevent communicable diseases from going out of hand.
And It is everyone's responsibility to take these healthy hygiene and food safety practices and apply them outside the household in every day life.
Only together we can combat a pathogen that went out of control by applying logical things in our daily lives that will keep all of us healthy.
bigredfish
Known around here
"People Need to be Held Accountable for What They Did" - Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene Attacks Biden Regime for Blocking Life Saving Treatment Ivermectin Against COVID-19 | The Gateway Pundit | by Jim Hᴏft
For almost three years, The Gateway Pundit has been reporting about the efficacy of Ivermectin and HCQ in treating COVID-19.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
There have now been 90 Ivermectin COVID-19 controlled studies from 963 scientists in 27 countries that show an 83%, 62%, and 39% improvement for prophylaxis, early, and late treatment respectively in COVID patients.
“178 ivermectin COVID-19 studies, 127 peer-reviewed, 90 comparing treatment and control groups. Ivermectin has been officially adopted for early treatment in all or part of 22 countries (38 including non-government medical organizations),” according to the COVID-19 treatment studies tracker website.
ClinicalTrials.gov
clinicaltrials.gov
mat200
IPCT Contributor
- Jan 17, 2017
- 15,194
- 25,666
FYI - distilled water .. does not have the minerals, so do plan to augment that ..
People are misinformed that the minerals that the body absorbs comes from water.
mat200
IPCT Contributor
- Jan 17, 2017
- 15,194
- 25,666
Distill Water absorbs minerals .. thus if you drink a lot of distilled water you have to counter that ..