Pandemic threat? Anyone else concerned?

Rob2020

Getting comfortable
Joined
Oct 2, 2020
Messages
814
Reaction score
2,093
Location
OR USA
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) played a direct role in policing permissible speech on social media throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Confidential emails obtained by Reason show that Facebook moderators were in constant contact with the CDC, and routinely asked government health officials to vet claims relating to the virus, mitigation efforts such as masks, and vaccines.

For a broader analysis of the federal government's pandemic-era efforts to suppress free speech—and whether they violated the First Amendment—see Reason's March 2023 cover story on the ramifications of these emails. This article provides screenshots of the emails themselves.

After Elon Musk took control of Twitter, he permitted several independent journalists to peruse the company's previous communications with the FBI, the CDC, the White House, and government officials elsewhere. These disclosures, which have become known as the Twitter Files, reveal that government bureaucrats put substantial pressure on Twitter to restrict alleged misinformation relating to elections, Hunter Biden, and COVID-19.

Story continues
 

mat200

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Jan 17, 2017
Messages
11,176
Reaction score
17,304
It's all your fault folks....

They knew: why didn't the unvaccinated do more to warn us?

"The unvaccinated knew what we didn't. Some of them said too little. Most said nothing at all. A lot of blood is now on their hands. "
looks like solid journalism from this source .. Babylon Bee competitor ?

1674588748086.png

..

"They knew: why didn't the unvaccinated do more to warn us?
The unvaccinated knew what we didn't. Some of them said too little. Most said nothing at all. A lot of blood is now on their hands.
As the world struggles to come to terms with the devastating effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, one question that continues to surface is why the unvaccinated didn't do more to warn us about the potential dangers of being injected.
While well intending citizens lined up, did the right thing, and received their COVID19 vaccinations -- now seeming to do more harm than good -- their unvaccinated friends stood by and let them do it. Some of them said too little. Some said nothing at all.

Even though they knew what we didn't.

Our blood is now on their hands."



..
 

Rob2020

Getting comfortable
Joined
Oct 2, 2020
Messages
814
Reaction score
2,093
Location
OR USA
Thank goodness we have fact checks :rolleyes:


Reuters.PNG


Millions of people have viewed a BBC News interview with a British cardiologist who used the broadcast to spread misinformation about COVID-19 vaccines.

Copies of the Jan. 13 interview can be found on Facebook (here, here and here), YouTube (here), and Twitter (here). In it, Dr. Aseem Malhotra tells the BBC newsreader that he believes the rollout of mRNA vaccines should be paused and investigated because he is “almost certain” that they are a “likely contributory factor to excess cardiovascular deaths” (timestamp 2:35 to 5:09).

Malhotra cites the British Heart Foundation (BHF) for reporting 30,000 excess cardiovascular deaths “during the pandemic or since the pandemic”.

A BHF spokesperson told Reuters that there were indeed 30,000 excess deaths involving ischaemic heart disease (IHD) in England between March 2020 and August 2022. This figure was reported in the BHF’s November 2022 “Tipping Point” report which analysed data from the Office for Health Improvement and Disparities (OHID), NHS England, and NHS Digital (here).

According to the report, COVID-19 infection was “a likely significant factor” of excess cardiovascular disease deaths during the first year of the pandemic, but by the second year the bigger driving factor of the excess was the additional strain that had been placed on health services.

Story continues
 

rolibr24

Getting comfortable
Joined
Dec 3, 2021
Messages
450
Reaction score
2,117
Location
USA
I'll stick to ham radio, as most of the time, one knows the conversation in advance. Just fill in the numbers!
That is a hobby that looks like something I could really get into.

But, I have a extremely addictive personality. I fully know that if I start looking into Ham, I will have a several hundred foot tower in my yard and will probably have to tap into the 3ph running across the road to power my equipment.
 

bigredfish

Known around here
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
31,396
Location
Florida USA
Nothing to see here…,

"Crimson Contagion"

What does it all mean? Perhaps it is all just a series of coincidental data points, that what is called the worst pandemic in 100 years came only a few months after an elaborate multi-agency trial run of the same in which former high officials of the Trump administration participated.

And perhaps the best person to run the Covid response also happened to be the very person who organized and managed the trial run in the previous season.

Many people will surely say there is nothing to see here. There is so much not to see these days.

What do you think?
 

bigredfish

Known around here
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
31,396
Location
Florida USA
Australia Sees Heart Attacks Increase By 17% In 2022 - "Experts" Blame Pandemic

Australia Sees Heart Attacks Increase By 17% In 2022 - "Experts" Blame Pandemic | ZeroHedge

The public has been bombarded with a stream of news stories in recent months seeking to explain the steady rise of heart attacks in western countries in the past two years. The epidemic is most concerning due to the large number of young and otherwise healthy people that are being stricken with heart problems otherwise reserved for older or clinically obese patients.
Explanations for the trend blame everything from video games to climate change. Of course, these scapegoats do not explain the statistical leap in heart failure in the past two years. The most common narrative is that the covid virus is the cause - The problem with this theory is that there is zero evidence to support the claim that covid causes potential heart ailments. In fact, studies show that there is no such thing as "covid heart", a false concept spread by the mainstream media at the onset of the pandemic.
Are the "experts" baffled? Or, are they trying to avoid the obvious culprit.

Australia is reporting a 17% increase in heart attacks in the first eight months of 2022 alone, and establishment paid researchers seem to be deliberately avoiding any mention of the covid mRNA vaccines. Instead, they are continuing to blame covid infection along with numerous peripheral and indirect triggers associated with the lockdowns.
Australia sees a 17% increase in deaths from heart attacks and experts are dumbfounded. pic.twitter.com/sH4Zh7a2tx
— Aaron Ginn (@aginnt) January 22, 2023
Multiple studies now show a direct relationship between vaccine status and Myocarditis, specifically in young people, and the attempts to suppress such information by Big Pharma and governments are failing. If side effects are related to developing auto-immune disorders triggered by mRNA as some researchers suspect, then symptoms in many vaccinated people may not become visible for months or years. But, as time passes, the extent of the damage will become clear to the public.
Pro-vaccine studies related to the dangers often do not include unvaccinated people as a control group for determining side effects, which suggests a desire to hide health risks associated with covid vaccination. Eventually the questions and the deaths are going to become too prominent for the mainstream to ignore. Are torches and pitchforks the inevitable end for vaccine enforcers and Big Pharma?
 

bigredfish

Known around here
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
31,396
Location
Florida USA
The Game Is Over And They Have Lost

The Game Is Over And They Have Lost | ZeroHedge


.......................... The script has worn itself out. These tropes are now tired and ineffective. The fear-pushers seem unaware that the message has lost its effect, but do not have anything else to offer. The tell is not that they publish articles like this. It is how much these pieces show that they don’t know that the game is over and they have lost.
 

bigredfish

Known around here
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
31,396
Location
Florida USA
Wuhan Collaborator EcoHealth Alliance Gets Fresh $3 Million Grant From DoD

Wuhan Collaborator EcoHealth Alliance Gets Fresh $3 Million Grant From DoD | ZeroHedge

Six weeks ago the Department of Defense (DoD) awarded a $3 million grant to EcoHealth Alliance, the New York-based nonprofit which was used to funnel millions of US taxpayer dollars to the Wuhan Institute of Virology, where they collaborated to make bat coronaviruses more transmissible to humans via gain-of-function genetic manipulation.

The grant was awarded as part of a DoD program related to countering weapons of mass destruction, as noted by Just the News and Rutgers professor Richard H. Ebright.

EcoHealth Alliance currently has federal contracts and grants from USAID, DoD-DTRA, DoD-USU, DHS, NIAID, and NSF.
— Richard H. Ebright (@R_H_Ebright) January 21, 2023
This latest grant from the DoD is officially meant for "reducing the threat of viral spillover from wildlife in the Philippines."
In 2014, the Obama administration temporarily suspended federal funding for gain-of-function research into manipulating bat COVID to be more transmissible to humans. Four months prior to that decision, the NIH effectively shifted this research to the Wuhan Institute of Virology (WIV) to EcoHealth, headed by Peter Daszak.

Notably, the WIV "had openly participated in gain-of-function research in partnership with U.S. universities and institutions" for years under the leadership of Dr. Shi 'Batwoman' Zhengli, according to the Washington Post's Josh Rogin.

Yet, after Sars-CoV-2 broke out in the same town where Daszak was manipulating Bat Covid, The Lancet published a screed by Daszak (signed by over two-dozen scientists), which insisted the virus could have only come from a natural spillover event, likely from a wet market, and that the scientists "stand together to strongly condemn conspiracy theories suggesting that COVID-19 does not have a natural origin." The Lancet only later noted Daszak's conflicts of interest.

Meanwhile, as we noted late last year, a Senate Committee on Health Education, Labor and Pensions interim report from October 27, 2022 titled “An Analysis of the Origins of the COVID19 Pandemic” concluded that the origins of Covid were more likely based in a lab as part of a “research related incident” and not zoonotic.
The report was the result of a “bipartisan Health, Education, Labor and Pensions (HELP) Committee oversight effort into the origins of SARS-CoV-2”. It provides a lengthy analysis that reviews “publicly available, open-source information to examine the two prevailing theories of origin of the SARS-CoV-2 virus”.
Among other conclusions, the report notes: “Substantial evidence suggests that the COVID-19 pandemic was the result of a research-related incident associated with a laboratory in Wuhan, China,” the report states.

In a section titled “Problems with the Natural Zoonotic Hypothesis”, the report says:
“Based on precedent and genomics, the most likely scenario for a zoonotic origin of the COVID-19 pandemic is that SARS-CoV-2 crossed over the species barrier from an intermediate host to humans. However, the available evidence is also consistent, perhaps more so, with a direct bat-to-human spillover. Both scenarios remain plausible and, in the absence of additional information, should be considered equally valid hypotheses."

"However, nearly three years after the COVID-19 pandemic began, critical evidence that would prove that the emergence of SARS-CoV-2 and resulting COVID-19 pandemic was caused by a natural zoonotic spillover is missing.”

“Such gaps include the failure to identify the original host reservoir, the failure to identify a candidate intermediate host species, and the lack of serological or epidemiological evidence showing transmission from animals to humans, among others outlined in this report,” the report states.
“As a result of these evidentiary gaps, it is hard to treat the natural zoonotic spillover theory as the presumptive origin of the COVID-19 pandemic.”

Then, in the report’s conclusion, it states:
“Based on the analysis of the publicly available information, it appears reasonable to conclude that the COVID-19 pandemic was, more likely than not, the result of a research-related incident. New information, made publicly available and independently verifiable, could change this assessment. However, the hypothesis of a natural zoonotic origin no longer deserves the benefit of the doubt, or the presumption of accuracy.
 

Rob2020

Getting comfortable
Joined
Oct 2, 2020
Messages
814
Reaction score
2,093
Location
OR USA
Judge questions clarity of new California law targeting doctors who share COVID-19 misinformation

A federal judge said Monday that he couldn’t make sense of a critical provision in a new law that punishes doctors for spreading false information about COVID-19 to their patients. Senior Judge William Shubb called its definition of misinformation “nonsense” during a hearing in the United States District Court in Sacramento. The Legislature approved the law, AB 2098, last year and it went into effect January 1. It says doctors who share false information about COVID-19 treatment options and vaccines, whether they did so deliberately or not, could be disciplined for “unprofessional conduct.” That could lead to them losing their license.

Read more at:
 
Top