Pandemic threat? Anyone else concerned?

gwminor48

Known around here
Joined
Jul 16, 2015
Messages
3,004
Reaction score
4,405
Location
Texas

bigredfish

Known around here
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
31,396
Location
Florida USA
^^^^^^^
That right there, if validated, is what we call a HSM (Holy Shit Moment). It would blow the lid off the safety claims of the Jab. (The efficacy claims have already been irrefutably discredited)

Safe and Effective

Kirsch is public enemy #1 to the Covidians. He’s been reporting deep Intel on them for some time.

This makes more sense now
 

bigredfish

Known around here
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
31,396
Location
Florida USA
On Our Way To The Unthinkable
On Our Way To The Unthinkable | ZeroHedge

Submitted by QTR's Fringe Finance
For the second time in as many business days, I wanted to write today about developments that reinforce an investment idea I was recently considering.
Except with this piece, I’m not talking about gold or the macro trade: this is about a far more speculative idea that I think has a much more pronounced risk reward profile.

Days ago, I wrote this article, raising serious questions about potential coming culpability for several entities in the event that the public, and then the market, realizes (due to evidence) that the mRNA vaccines that were widely distributed to billions of people may not have been as safe or harmless as we were told. After all, we already know for sure they aren’t as effective as we were told they would be.

In just the 96 short hours since I first brought up the admittedly high-risk investment idea, a number of developments have taken place that I wanted my readers to be aware of because I believe they serve as several of a very long string of waypoints that could eventually end up with us waking up one day to a profound change in how the market looks at several companies. If you haven’t yet, you should read my first article about the idea here: Betting On The Unthinkable
Now, what else has developed that would lead me to believe that the vaccines could be at risk moving forward?

First there was new research out of Germany, published in the peer-reviewed journal Frontiers in Immunology, that revealed that mRNA booster shots are prompting the body to make different, “less effective” antibodies. Alex Berenson over at Unreported Truths wrote about the new research:

The new paper found that months after the second mRNA dose, people began to produce more of an antibody subclass called IgG4. IgG4 is usually the least common of the subtypes. It does not trigger a strong immune response after it latches to the virus.
The change was particularly obvious in people who had not been infected before receiving the vaccine, the researchers found.
The change also appeared to be dose-related. It occurred more strongly in people who had received the Moderna jab, which contains more than three times the mRNA as the Pfizer shot. (The fact that the other group of researchers found the change accelerated after a third shot is also evidence of a dose-response relationship.)



He continued: “Taken together, those findings suggest strongly that the immune system change to produce this weaker antibody is a protective response to an abnormality caused by the mRNAs. The long-term impact of the switch to IgG4 antibodies is unclear.”
Additionally, there has been new research published in the peer-reviewed European Journal of Pediatrics that shows 17% of teenagers - who shouldn’t even be getting the jab to begin with due to their disproportionately low risk for Covid complications versus the common flu - have had heart symptoms after getting their second Pfizer mRNA jab.

On top of that, we also find out from Berenson that “Pfizer’s bivalent Covid booster raised the risk of stroke for people over 65, according to a federal database that the government considers the gold standard for tracking vaccine side effects.”
All of these developments have come over the last week. As Berenson astutely alludes to, these are simply more “details” we’ll be figuring out well after we’ve jabbed billions of people.

But what's the investment idea here? (READ THIS FULL ARTICLE HERE TO FIND OUT).
 

bigredfish

Known around here
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
31,396
Location
Florida USA
I suspect we’ll see a snowball of CYA actions over the next few months as the idiots who went along with the charade try to get in front of the ugly truth

NY Supreme Court Strikes Down COVID Vaccine Mandate For Health Care Workers


a landmark ruling issued on Jan. 13, state Supreme Court Judge Gerard Neri declared the statewide COVID-19 vaccine mandate for medical staff “null, void, and of no effect.”

Hochul and the state Department of Health exceeded their authority by sidestepping the state legislature in imposing a permanent COVID-19 vaccine mandate for medical professionals, the judge wrote in the order (pdf).

Neri also found that the mandate was “arbitrary and capricious,” citing evidence that COVID-19 vaccines don’t prevent the spread of the virus, undercutting the basis for the mandate.
“In true Orwellian fashion, the Respondents acknowledge then-current COVID-19 shots do not prevent transmission,” Neri wrote, citing a Summary of Assessment of Public Comment that was entered as evidence in the case.
In support of the view that the mandate was capricious, Neri also pointed to the fact that the order, titled Prevention of COVID-19 Transmission by Covered Entities (pdf), used a loose definition for “fully vaccinated,” namely one that was “determined by the Department.”

Neri wrote, “A term which is defined at the whim of an entity, subject to change without a moment’s notice contains all the hallmarks of ‘absurdity’ and is no definition at all.”
 

Rob2020

Getting comfortable
Joined
Oct 2, 2020
Messages
814
Reaction score
2,093
Location
OR USA
In my home state,

State sequencing data has not identified any XBB.1.5 infections since a handful were found in mid-December, though that data is delayed several weeks and, as of the most recent batch, included only nine samples. But federal modeling indicates the subvariant accounted for only about 8% of all cases across Oregon, Washington and Idaho during the week ending Jan. 14, compared to more than 80% in parts of the East Coast.

Oregon.PNG


Complete story
 

bigredfish

Known around here
Joined
Sep 5, 2016
Messages
11,877
Reaction score
31,396
Location
Florida USA
And Now, The Facebook Files: Emails Reveal The CDC's Role In Silencing COVID-19 Dissent

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) played a direct role in policing permissible speech on social media throughout the COVID-19 pandemic. Confidential emails obtained by Reason show that Facebook moderators were in constant contact with the CDC, and routinely asked government health officials to vet claims relating to the virus, mitigation efforts such as masks, and vaccines.
 

mat200

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Jan 17, 2017
Messages
11,176
Reaction score
17,304
:rofl::winktongue::lol:

Honestly, after watching numerous customers sneeze and even taste food and put partially eaten food back on the shelves ( both children and adults ) .. I am completely OK with people wearing masks in the store .. significantly reduced the nasty gross behavior I have seen ..

yet .. I never saw the "traffic patterns" as seriously going to make much of a difference in most stores which have wide enough aisles that you can walk past someone ( typical of most large chain stores food stores .. )
 
Last edited:
Top