bigredfish
Known around here
COVID Mask Wearers Could Be Exposed To Toxic Chemicals: Study
COVID Mask Wearers Could Be Exposed To Toxic Chemicals: Study | ZeroHedge
COVID Mask Wearers Could Be Exposed To Toxic Chemicals: Study | ZeroHedge
Pandemic threat? Anyone else concerned?
- Thread starter erkme73
- Start date
bigredfish
Known around here
Sen. Johnson Claims CDC 'Abused Authority,' Engaged In 'Censorship Campaign' Of COVID-19 Vaccine Posts
www.zerohedge.com
The Wisconsin senator, who has been a vocal advocate for people who claim to have been injured by COVID-19 vaccines, went on to cite the censorship of his own Jan. 3, 2022 post on X, formerly known as Twitter, in which he highlighted data from the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Reporting System (VAERS) database.
In that post, Mr. Johnson wrote: "Sadly, we passed two milestones on VAERS. Over 1 million advisers events and over 21,000 deaths, 30 percent of those deaths occurred on day 0, 1, or 2 following vaccination.
"When will federal agencies start being transparent with Americans? Why do they continue to ignore early treatment?" he concluded.
The post, which included a screenshot of the data from VAERS, was labeled "misleading" in a note explaining that health officials consider COVID-19 vaccines to be "safe for most people."
ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
The Wisconsin senator, who has been a vocal advocate for people who claim to have been injured by COVID-19 vaccines, went on to cite the censorship of his own Jan. 3, 2022 post on X, formerly known as Twitter, in which he highlighted data from the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Reporting System (VAERS) database.
In that post, Mr. Johnson wrote: "Sadly, we passed two milestones on VAERS. Over 1 million advisers events and over 21,000 deaths, 30 percent of those deaths occurred on day 0, 1, or 2 following vaccination.
"When will federal agencies start being transparent with Americans? Why do they continue to ignore early treatment?" he concluded.
The post, which included a screenshot of the data from VAERS, was labeled "misleading" in a note explaining that health officials consider COVID-19 vaccines to be "safe for most people."
bigredfish
Known around here
Great watch. Did not know about the Trans/Autism link...
Parley
Known around here
'FDA is not a Physician': Federal Appeals Court Sides with Doctors on Ivermectin
A federal appeals court on Friday gave three doctors the green light to pursue their lawsuit against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over using ivermectin off-label to treat COVID-19.
Just weeks after hearing the case, the 5th Circuit reversed a district court’s dismissal on the grounds that the FDA has sovereign immunity. (The decision is at the bottom for paid subscribers to read.)
The ruling was written by U.S. Circuit Judge Don Willett, a Pres. Donald Trump appointee. He pointed to the FDA’s social media posts (below) about ivermectin that made it seem the medication was for farm animals.
5th Circuit Rules Doctors Can Sue FDA over Ivermectin for COVID-19 (emilypostnews.com)
A federal appeals court on Friday gave three doctors the green light to pursue their lawsuit against the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) over using ivermectin off-label to treat COVID-19.
Just weeks after hearing the case, the 5th Circuit reversed a district court’s dismissal on the grounds that the FDA has sovereign immunity. (The decision is at the bottom for paid subscribers to read.)
The ruling was written by U.S. Circuit Judge Don Willett, a Pres. Donald Trump appointee. He pointed to the FDA’s social media posts (below) about ivermectin that made it seem the medication was for farm animals.
5th Circuit Rules Doctors Can Sue FDA over Ivermectin for COVID-19 (emilypostnews.com)
mat200
IPCT Contributor
- Jan 17, 2017
- 15,105
- 25,511
bigredfish
Known around here
Oceanslider
Known around here
Time-Stamped, but there is important information previous. But those fires in Canada, yeah sure the, so called, experts saying lightning, but with no clouds?, as I had posted the time lapse satellite in another thread,
Smilingreen
Known around here
The next version of covid face mask. Works just as good as the first version.
This asshole is like Biden, he can't stop lying. I'm surprised to hear CNN even questioning him about masks.
RFK Jr talking about the Pfizer clinical trials and what they all knew.
vigilantnews.com
Viral RFK Jr. Video Gets Deleted By “X”: Here’s What They Didn’t Want You to See
“Freedom of speech, not reach,” is taking effect more than ever as Twitter (“X”) regresses to its 1.0 days.
vigilantnews.com
Smilingreen
Known around here
Do any of you remember "the swine flu" scare of the mid 70's here in the US? Think back and do a comparison to present day "covid".
bigredfish
Known around here
The censor Fucks at Youtube (Google/Youtube) are the absolute biggest threat to free society.
bigredfish
Known around here
Judicial Watch: Pfizer Records Reveal 23-Person Study of Covid Vaccine Booster Safety and Effectiveness before Approval - Judicial Watch
(Washington, DC) – Judicial Watch released 58 pages of records from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) showing that a Pfizer study surveyed 23 people in 2021 to gauge reactions to its Covid vaccine booster before asking the FDA to approve it. The FDA indicated that this production of...
www.judicialwatch.org
bigredfish
Known around here
Fair warning
This will put all but the few diehard covid research nerds like myself to sleep. But it’s the actual documented history as told by Dr Malone, the REAL inventor of mRNA technology (who is and has been from day #1 a staunch critic of the “vaccines”) and who has not (nor desires to) profited in any way from them.
Moderna, a DARPA born entity, and FUPfizer, are currently lobbing lawsuits at each other about patents and such (perhaps because they see their obscene profits drying up) and Dr Malone is enjoying watching the cat fight as he holds the real goods.
The Delights Of The Pfizer/Moderna Catfight
www.zerohedge.com
This will put all but the few diehard covid research nerds like myself to sleep. But it’s the actual documented history as told by Dr Malone, the REAL inventor of mRNA technology (who is and has been from day #1 a staunch critic of the “vaccines”) and who has not (nor desires to) profited in any way from them.
Moderna, a DARPA born entity, and FUPfizer, are currently lobbing lawsuits at each other about patents and such (perhaps because they see their obscene profits drying up) and Dr Malone is enjoying watching the cat fight as he holds the real goods.
The Delights Of The Pfizer/Moderna Catfight
ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
bigredfish
Known around here
Disease-X Is A High-Return Business Strategy
brownstone.org
Disease X Is A High-Return Business Strategy ⋆ Brownstone Institute
Disease X is a business strategy, dependent on a series of fallacies, dressed up as an altruistic concern for human welfare.
brownstone.org
bigredfish
Known around here
I know most people here think they’re done with this charade, but mmmm not yet! There are still millions of Covidians who ain’t gonna let it go, and until Bidet can get us into a shooting war with Russia, they need some crisis to keep everyone distracted.
GOP Governors Say 'Not Happening Here' After Maryland School Implements N-95 Mask Mandate
www.zerohedge.com
GOP Governors Say 'Not Happening Here' After Maryland School Implements N-95 Mask Mandate
ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
www.zerohedge.com
mat200
IPCT Contributor
- Jan 17, 2017
- 15,105
- 25,511
Fair warning
This will put all but the few diehard covid research nerds like myself to sleep. But it’s the actual documented history as told by Dr Malone, the REAL inventor of mRNA technology (who is and has been from day #1 a staunch critic of the “vaccines”) and who has not (nor desires to) profited in any way from them.
Moderna, a DARPA born entity, and FUPfizer, are currently lobbing lawsuits at each other about patents and such (perhaps because they see their obscene profits drying up) and Dr Malone is enjoying watching the cat fight as he holds the real goods.
The Delights Of The Pfizer/Moderna Catfight
ZeroHedge
ZeroHedge - On a long enough timeline, the survival rate for everyone drops to zero
Patent and IP related court battles seem to be a standard game for larger businesses ..
According to a court filing on Monday, music publisher Warner/Chappell will pay $14 million to end a lawsuit challenging its hold on the English language’s most popular song, “Happy Birthday to You.” Additionally, the settlement stipulates a proposed final judgment and order that would declare the song to be in the public domain. A memorandum in support of the settlement sings the praises of the deal as “truly, an historic result.” U.S. District Judge George H. King will have to sign off on it.
The revelation of the settlement terms comes after King came to the conclusion this past September that Warner and its predecessor didn’t hold any valid copyright to the song and never acquired the rights to the “Happy Birthday” lyrics. At the time, the judge stopped short of declaring that the song was in the public domain, and just before a trial was set to begin in December exploring the history of a song dating back to a 19th century schoolteacher named Patty Smith Hill and her sister Mildred Hill, the sides reached an agreement.
Warners was expecting to have “Happy Birthday” under copyright until 2030. An IP valuation expert retained by the plaintiffs estimated that the song was to reap between $14 million to $16.5 million in the next 15 years.
“The judicial determination that ‘Happy Birthday’ is in the public domain also has substantial value,” states the memorandum in support of the settlement. “Because Defendants have charged for use of the Song, untold thousands of people chose not to use the Song in their own performances and artistic works or to perform the Song in public. This has limited the number of times the Song was performed and used. After the Settlement is approved, that restraint will be removed and the Song will be performed and used far more often than it has been in the past. While there is no way to make a reliable estimate of the increase that will result, there can be no dispute that the increase will be substantial.”
An agreement to have a judge declare the song in the public domain is no doubt unusual and will likely command some attention by the judge on review.
But for now, the settlement provides a big final act to the class action lawsuit brought by film director Jennifer Nelson, who was making a documentary about “Happy Birthday” and was asked to pay a $1,500 license fee. She sued to hinder Warners from ever forcing film and TV producers, or others, to pay again. The plaintiffs argued that a song appearing in early 20th-century children’s textbooks had to be in the public domain because of general publication, abandonment or the length of the copyright term.
By agreeing to the settlement, Warners avoids going to trial to determine whether it should be punished for collecting licensing money for many decades. The music publisher also forgoes an appeal that it teased. The defendant continues to believe that a 1935 copyright registration should have entitled it to a presumption of copyright validity and that the song isn’t in the public domain, but it has agreed to a judgment that states otherwise.
The plaintiffs were represented by attorneys led by Mark Rifkin, who according to the settlement terms will be seeking a $4.62 million fee, a third of the $14 million settlement fund. The rest would go to those who have paid to license “Happy Birthday” and meet the definition of the proposed class. Those folks are estimated to have spent more than $50 million on licensing fees on “Happy Birthday” over the years.
Last week, in announcing its quarterly earnings, Warner Music Group partly blamed an operating loss on expenses related to the “Happy Birthday” settlement. A hearing on the settlement is scheduled in March.
bigredfish
Known around here
COVID Mask Wearers Could Be Exposed To Toxic Chemicals: Study
COVID Mask Wearers Could Be Exposed To Toxic Chemicals: Study | ZeroHedge
COVID Mask Wearers Could Be Exposed To Toxic Chemicals: Study | ZeroHedge
Was at Safelite today and there was a guy in the waiting room wearing a mask. Saw one lady wearing one yesterday in a restaurant, but not over her nose.