I installed about a dozen Engenius bridges early on, between 2006 and 2010 but it's been Ubiquiti for me since then.
If there is Line Of Sight (LOS) between the 2 points to be spanned I'd go with a Ubiquiti Layer 2 Transparent Bridge ==>>
airMAX - Guide to Configure a Point-to-Point Link (Layer 2, Transparent Bridge)
I've installed over a dozen of them in the last several years and all are still working great but the Nanostations and Loco's of both 2.4 and 5GHz flavor have been hard to get or VERY expensive this past year or so. About the only one in stock right now is this one for $60, quite overkill for your distance but you can dial back the transmit power==>>
Ubiquiti airMAX LiteBeam Gen 2 5AC 5GHz 23dBi CPE US
I hesitate to recommend a pair of the
TP-LINK CPE210 radios even though I put one in 2 weeks ago on 1/28/23 and it's working great BUT....all my Ubiquiti installs have been running with no hiccups for over 8 years now...time will tell about the TP-LINK wireless bridge. I was between a rock and a hard place so I had to go with it.
EDIT 4/4/23 2040 hrs CT: Over 2 months now for the budget TP-LINK CPE210's mentioned above and they've been rock steady according to the client. I'm pleased but still hope the Ubiquiti radios, especially the Nanostations, become more available and prices comes down.
If set up correctly the Ubiquiti Layer 2 Transp. Bridge will be like a CAT-5e cable, but without the distance limitations, will be a dielectric media that won't attract or conduct ESD / lightning damage but of course, cannot carry POE voltage.
Here's the schema I've used the last several years. The above Litebeams are different as far as configuration terms but the instructions above to the Ubiquiti airMAX Guide will make that distinction between "AC" devices (like the Litebeam above) and "M" devices (the type in my image below) when configuring.
