Still deciding on which camera to go with

Compare those with @CanCuba who has airport runway lighting and see the difference.

Just like all other cameras, its all about light
 
  • Like
Reactions: JDreaming
I have one 2.8mm 4K-X bullet original firmware version from the year 2021 as an overview camera. I don't really notice the close-focusing problem like other guys often mention here in the forum. Maybe I got lucky or the 2.8mm 4K-X bullet version do better than other versions of this camera with the focus problem. For me, other then the size of the 4K-X bullet is too big and the mic volume is kind of low I'm very happy with the camera and it's working well 3 plus years now.
 
Original FW 4K-X bullet 3.6mm

Notice the first 6-8ft or so on the shutter is blurred

Distances to me
1- 12ft
2- 35ft
3- 50ft
Looks like some minimal blurring on the rooftop within that 6-8 ft, although watching you come out walking does look clear.

At 12ft it looks like I would be able to identify

At 35ft were about loosing identify it seems. Looks like we might be able to identify well up to 20ft even using the 3.6 mm.

So at night-time these distances can diminish?
 
Our long time resident camera expert Wildcat ran the Dahua 4K/X 8MP 1/1.2" sensor thru the paces. Keep in mind this 4K/X camera is incredible.

He had the 3.6mm version and here is the screenshot from 40 feet in the ideal daylight and standing still, which based on DORI numbers is the supposed IDENTIFY distance for this camera with the 3.6mm lens and I think most of would agree that this is not IDENTIFY quality, even if digitally zoomed in:


I have the 4K/X and 4K/T and they are incredible cameras, but I wouldn't use it for IDENTIFY past 15-20 feet, or half of what the DORI number is.
Thanks for sharing that photo. I have watched a few of his videos.


Yeah, I see now how no way can we identify far beyond 20ft using the 4K-X 3.6mm. Great distance view. I can make out somebody there but will never be able to identify at that range using that size focal length. I'm starting to get it more so. :thumb:
 
Take a look at this video where I compared the 2.8mm, 3.6mm, and 6mm 4K-X cameras. The telephone pole in the center of the screen is exactly 50' from the 4K-X. The middle of the street is 32', and when the guy crosses in front of the camera at 2:51, he is 13' from the 6mm camera. Be sure to watch it in 2160p.
 
I have one 2.8mm 4K-X bullet original firmware version from the year 2021 as an overview camera. I don't really notice the close-focusing problem like other guys often mention here in the forum. Maybe I got lucky or the 2.8mm 4K-X bullet version do better than other versions of this camera with the focus problem. For me, other then the size of the 4K-X bullet is too big and the mic volume is kind of low I'm very happy with the camera and it's working well 3 plus years now.

I agree with the sizing of the 4K-X bullet being a bit on the large side. I also feel that way too, reason being I thought the turret version would look better against my wall. I would like to see the turret version also come in the 6 mm lens (like with the bullet version).

I also like that the turret versions come in black. Would be nice to see the bullet in black.

Can the firmware on these security cameras always be downgraded if ever necessary?
 
Take a look at this video where I compared the 2.8mm, 3.6mm, and 6mm 4K-X cameras. The telephone pole in the center of the screen is exactly 50' from the 4K-X. The middle of the street is 32', and when the guy crosses in front of the camera at 2:51, he is 13' from the 6mm camera. Be sure to watch it in 2160p.

Very nice. Thanks for sharing the videos. You caught some possums there on the 2.8 mm. :)

Night time view looks a little fuzzy. Day time looks much sharper.

I like the 3.6 and 6 mm cameras.
 
Last edited:
Anybody have any photos showing how the bullet and turret looks hanging on their exterior walls? Would be nice to get a general perspective on how the sizes of these cameras look on the wall..