US Elections (& Politics) :)

Sybertiger

Known around here
Joined
Jun 30, 2018
Messages
4,863
Reaction score
14,128
Location
Orlando
I'm curious to know on what grounds the NY case against Trump would be thrown out based on the SCOTUS immunity ruling regarding "official acts". I don't recall NY's claims of criminal acts by Trump were "official acts" of POTUS. In fact, they were prior to Trump being POTUS. Maybe someone here can shed some light.

1719948988604.png
 

TonyR

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
17,677
Reaction score
41,149
Location
Alabama
Watch the whole video to understand what a liar he's been now for AT LEAST 36 years, not to mention the plagiarism. He's been lying for so long they just roll off his tongue naturally. If his mouth is moving, he's lying.

Joe Biden's lies are legendary. He's still the same dishonest plagiarist he was 36 years ago.

 

garycrist

Known around here
Joined
Sep 25, 2021
Messages
2,448
Reaction score
7,242
Location
Texas
Ever since Richard Nixon, the "Press" has "Press"ed and "Pull"ed our legs (Three Stooges Pun) by
lie after lie after lie to cover those worthless Demoncrats. They have had a grudge since the trouncing
they received in Chicago in 1968!

As a side note, Remember the Maine. To hell with Spain. Thank you William Randolph Hearst.
How many our boys did YOU kill in another Demo war?
 

mat200

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Jan 17, 2017
Messages
14,318
Reaction score
23,900
Ever since Richard Nixon, the "Press" has "Press"ed and "Pull"ed our legs (Three Stooges Pun) by
lie after lie after lie to cover those worthless Demoncrats. They have had a grudge since the trouncing
they received in Chicago in 1968!

As a side note, Remember the Maine. To hell with Spain. Thank you William Randolph Hearst.
How many our boys did YOU kill in another Demo war?
Yellow journalism at its finest
 

TonyR

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Jul 15, 2014
Messages
17,677
Reaction score
41,149
Location
Alabama
Excerpt:

“This decision today has continued the court’s attack in recent years on a wide range of long established legal principles in our nation – from gutting voting rights and civil rights to taking away a woman’s right to choose, to today’s decision that undermines the rule of law of this nation,” he said.
Me:

No, dumbass...and as usual you and your party are the ones spreading "DIS-information".​
By "gutting voting rights" do you mean requiring a photo ID, not allowing you to vote twice or not wanting dead people to vote?​
By "taking away a woman’s right to choose" you mean putting the rules and handling of abortion back in the hands of the states instead of governance by the Feds?​

 
Top