US Elections (& Politics) :)

Even Fox???

Fox News’ Brian Kilmeade Says Donald Trump Was ‘Unhinged’ Before Jan. 6 Riot (Video)



  • Donald Trump
0b60107555731a5721506dd459be31c0

Fox News’ Brian Kilmeade Says Donald Trump Was ‘Unhinged’ Before Jan. 6 Riot (Video)
Thom Geier
Sun, June 26, 2022 at 8:26 PM


In this article:



  • Donald Trump

    Donald Trump
    45th President of the United States


Fox News’ host Brian Kilmeade launched an unexpected broadside at Donald Trump, calling the former president “unhinged” after the 2020 election in the period before the Capitol riot on January 6, 2021.
Speaking on Howard Kurtz’s “Media Buzz” show on Sunday about the House Jan. 6 committee hearings, Kilmeade also rejected Trump’s repeated assertions that “he was robbed” due to widespread election fraud. “I have not seen any evidence,” he said, adding that Trump’s continued false claims are hurting his chances for political comeback.
“I’ve said this before, I believe from the time when the election results came in until January 6th is the worst moment of Donald Trump’s political career, and had he just said I’ve got problems, I’m going to have my legal team look at it, going to welcome the Bidens to the White House, he’d have about 70% approval rating right now and a clamoring to have him back in office,” the “Fox & Friends” host said. “It would be a coronation, not even an election. So I think how you lose in life defines who you are, and even if there are things that bother you, welcome to the world.”

Well ctgold wing this article is just for you. Looks like the Jan 6 committee is lying.

Exclusive: Former White House Staffer Confirms Jan. 6 Committee Lied About DOJ Attorney

Over the weekend, former Department of Justice lawyer Ken Klukowski called on the Jan. 6 Committee to release the full transcript of his deposition testimony to correct the lies they told about him to the American public. Now The Federalist has exclusively obtained a statement from a former White House staffer confirming Klukowski’s claims.

Last Thursday, the Jan. 6, 2021 show trial continued, with the Democrat-stacked committee presenting testimony concerning a draft letter Jeff Clark, a former assistant attorney general in the Department of Justice, proposed sending to the Georgia legislature.

That draft letter, dated December 28, 2020, stated the Department of Justice was investigating the 2020 election and recommended the Georgia legislature convene a special session to “evaluate the irregularities in the 2020 election including violations of Georgia election law,” and “determine whether those violations show which candidate for President won the most legal votes in the November 3 election.” The draft letter then suggested the General Assembly could appoint an alternative set of electors based on its findings.

The draft letter’s signature line included spaces for Clark, Acting Attorney General Jeffrey A. Rosen, and Acting Deputy Attorney General Richard Donoghue. But when Clark pitched the idea of sending the letter to Georgia officials, Rosen and Donoghue rejected the idea out of hand, because it was “not the department’s role to suggest or dictate to state legislatures how they should select their electors,” and “for the department to insert itself into the political process this way,” Donoghue told the committee, “may very well have spiraled us into a constitutional crisis.”

Donoghue was blunter with Clark in person, with Donoghue testifying he told Clark, “What you are doing is nothing less than the United States Justice Department meddling in the outcome of a presidential election.”

While last Thursday’s hearing by the Jan. 6 Committee centered on Clark and his efforts to have the letter sent to the Georgia legislature, the committee connected another DOJ attorney to Clark’s efforts, Klukowski—and did so by blatantly lying to the American public.

Exclusive: WH Staffer Confirms Jan. 6 Committee Lied About DOJ Attorney (thefederalist.com)
 
Well well well..... HOWARD STERN wants to be President. LOL

But wait--- there's More--- He is going to get rid of the Electoral College! Bahahahahahahahahahaha

 
Last edited:
"Turnabout is fair play", and who said I'm a "liberal"? If a "Liberal" is somebody who will not vote to turn the country into a ultra right-wing autocratic theocracy, then I am.
Why would you think that's a possibility. It's not by the way--- that would clearly go against a large chunk of our constitution.

It seems like leftists fear some "right wing takeover" and establishing a dictatorship. The danger of that is clearly and absolutely on the left, as they are the ones with such open disdain of the Constitution. The majority of conservatives want the constitution of this country FOLLOWED.
 
Well well well..... HOWARD STERN wants to be President. LOL

But wait--- there's More--- He is going to get rid of the Electoral College! Bahahahahahahahahahaha

Why would you think that's a possibility. It's not by the way--- that would clearly go against a large chunk of our constitution.

It seems like leftists fear some "right wing takeover" and establishing a dictatorship. The danger of that is clearly and absolutely on the left, as they are the ones with such open disdain of the Constitution. The majority of conservatives want the constitution of this country FOLLOWED.
Oh, maybe its got something to do with your Golden Golem of Greatness and his admiration for Authoritarian Dictatorships he seemed particularly fond of Putins "President for Life", and the Puritan Hats the most of SCOTUS now wears (they only "came out of the closet" once they had majority).
 
Oh, maybe its got something to do with your Golden Golem of Greatness and his admiration for Authoritarian Dictatorships he seemed particularly fond of Putins "President for Life", and the Puritan Hats the most of SCOTUS now wears (they only "came out of the closet" once they had majority).
Wow. That is some seriously athletic jumping you're doing to reach those conclusions.

Why aren't we in a right wing dictatorship now? Lemme guess-- ANTIFA stopped it? LOL

So you hate Trump. OK. Please tell me about how his POLICIES hurt you or the country-- because THAT is what matters at the end of the day.
 
Wow. That is some seriously athletic jumping you're doing to reach those conclusions.

Why aren't we in a right wing dictatorship now? Lemme guess-- ANTIFA stopped it? LOL

So you hate Trump. OK. Please tell me about how his POLICIES hurt you or the country-- because THAT is what matters at the end of the day.
What "stopped it" was that he LOST the Election (as he admitted privately it turns out). This was also "another" "Great Disappointment" for a large portion of his religious base, who thought prior to 2020 that although most didn't like Trump at all, thought he was "Gods Tool" (he was a Tool all right..) and that he would be re-elected, and then The Rapture" would follow in four more years. He liked that too, for anybody who thinks that would believe anything he said...
I'll work on the "policy list", unlike most here, I don't rely on "Q" (are you guys getting more "Q-Tips"...ha, ha, ha,) or any other contrived magnified Village Gossip (A.K.A. "Social Media) so may take a bit....
 
  • Like
Reactions: qflyer
Open border catch and release into the country policy.

All that needs to be done is have a policy that allows only those that follow the law are allowed to say in the country.

View attachment 131993





Does this sound about right?

Liberals: "This is a sad event and it is the kind of thing that happens when the borders are NOT open. Poor, downtrodden, freedom-seeking immigrants risk their lives just to come to America. If we would just open the borders this sort of thing would not happen to the innocents, there would be no victims like this."
Conservatives: "This is a sad event, no doubt. But if we had totally open borders the gangs and drug cartel operatives would explode into the streets even more than now and the numbers of homicides in the inner cities and overdoses and deaths everywhere due to illicit drugs would be 10X that it is now. The law abiding, USA-born citizens and the law abiding, legal immigrant citizens of this country would be the victims, including the innocents."
 
Last edited:
Does this sound about right?

Liberals: "This is a sad event and it is the kind of thing that happens when the borders are NOT open. Poor, downtrodden, freedom-seeking immigrants risk their lives just to come to America. If we would just open the borders this sort of thing would not happen to the innocents, there would be no victims like this."
Conservatives: "This is a sad event, no doubt. But if we had totally open borders the gangs and drug cartel operatives would explode into the streets even more than now and the numbers of homicides in the inner cities and overdoses and deaths everywhere due to illicit drugs would be 10X that it is now. The law abiding, USA-born citizens and the law abiding, legal immigrant citizens of this country would be the victims, including the innocents."
So let’s legalize drugs. No more drug cartels when you can go to the local pharmacy and buy your clean and regulated drugs, right?
But then what excuse would you come up with to turn brown people away?
 
  • Wow
Reactions: Parley
^^^^ Yeah, that worked out really well in Seattle, didn't it
 
So let’s legalize drugs. No more drug cartels when you can go to the local pharmacy and buy your clean and regulated drugs, right?
But then what excuse would you come up with to turn brown people away?

Why would that happen?
 
So let’s legalize drugs. No more drug cartels when you can go to the local pharmacy and buy your clean and regulated drugs, right?
But then what excuse would you come up with to turn brown people away?

Leftist always play the race card. By the way Hispanics are jumping over to the Republican Party in big numbers. They do not like Biden's border policies either. A Hispanic Republic Congresswoman just got elected to a district in Texas with a 97% Democrat registration edge.
 
Leftist always play the race card. By the way Hispanics are jumping over to the Republican Party in big numbers. They do not like Biden's border policies either. A Hispanic Republic Congresswoman just got elected to a district in Texas with a 97% Democrat registration edge.
I'm not a leftist. I thought republicans supported small, limited government? Yet here you are wanting more and more policies, laws, federal agents, etc to stop people who just want to come work. What's up with that?