Wonder how this will impact pricing, ability to get cameras.
U.S. Weighs Blacklisting Five Chinese Video Surveillance Firms
U.S. Weighs Blacklisting Five Chinese Video Surveillance Firms
Dahua demonstrated at a recent G20 Summit how it used GPU-based deep learning to do real-time face recognition, enabling security teams to extend their capabilities and effectively take on the work of 100+ personnel.
“We’re working with NVIDIA to bring AI to our next-generation of deep learning products,” said Xingming Zhang, vice president of Dahua R&D Center. “Dahua’s DeepSense advanced, high-capacity video analytics server delivers a powerful, scalable method of extracting rich metadata and processing structural data. This delivers fast and accurate analytics for vehicles, non-motorized vehicles and human identification.”
Good thing I ordered 4 x IPC-HDW4231EM-ASE last week and 4 x IPC-HDW5231R-ZE / 1 x IPC-HFW2831T-ZS last night!
for my orders, they are Duhua. Can't say I know why they are named IPC. I'm sure someone could explainIs IPC a new company? Seems to look a lot like Hikvision for some reason!
Its great the cheating and theft must stop. China cams are not watching secret facilities.No it's not good. Wouldn't surprise me though.
Funny thing is they've been aiming suspicions / allegations at Huwaei for it's internet gear whilst probably every top secret lab / government building / bunker /Area 51 etc in the country is being watched by Chinese cameras.
I think IPC is part of the model number and means the camera uses IP. Models that start with HAC mean the camera uses HDCVI. At least that's how Dahua seems to use those prefixes.Is IPC a new company? Seems to look a lot like Hikvision for some reason!
Wonder what US tech gets used in Hik/Dahua cameras?
for my orders, they are Duhua. Can't say I know why they are named IPC. I'm sure someone could explainI just run with it. Maybe, International Product Code!
for my orders, they are Duhua. Can't say I know why they are named IPC. I'm sure someone could explainI just run with it. Maybe, International Product Code!
Dear Valued Partner:
The New York Times reported on May 21 that the U.S. Government is considering limiting Hikvision’s ability to purchase American technology as a tactic in the current trade war with China.
The article quotes anonymous sources and as of May 22, there has been no public statement from The White House, nor official confirmation of the report from Administration officials. The story includes no definitive time frame, saying that Trump administration officials “could make a final decision in coming weeks.”
We want to assure you that we are aware of The New York Times report and have provided the below response, which has since been included in the article:
“Hikvision takes these concerns very seriously and has engaged with the U.S. government regarding all of this since last October. In light of them, it has already retained human rights expert and former U.S. Ambassador Pierre-Richard Prosper to advise the company regarding human rights compliance. Separately, Hikvision takes cybersecurity very seriously as a company and follows all applicable laws and regulations in the United States and other countries, regions and jurisdictions we operate.”
The article also includes a reference to the company’s Environmental, Social, Governance (ESG) Report that was published in April 2019, stating:
“In a letter published in English in April, Hikvision’s chief compliance officer said that the company was taking reports that video surveillance products had been involved in human rights violations seriously and had commissioned an internal review of its operations to enhance screening standards to better protect human rights. ‘We are taking a hard look at our products and business,’ the officer, Huang Fanghong, wrote.”
Further, we are also actively seeking further information from government officials, where we will continue to be transparent with our communications. Hikvision will continue to closely monitor developments related to this report, and we will keep you apprised as more concrete information becomes available.
Thank you once again for your partnership and continued support of Hikvision and our employees. We remain fully focused on providing quality service to our valued partners while delivering business excellence and safeguarding our communities. Meanwhile, we will continue to vigorously defend ourselves and the interests of our partners and their customers.
If you have any concerns or questions, please feel free to reach out to your local Hikvision representative or me directly.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey He
Vice President
Hangzhou Hikvision Digital Technology, Ltd
Good thing I ordered 4 x IPC-HDW4231EM-ASE last week and 4 x IPC-HDW5231R-ZE / 1 x IPC-HFW2831T-ZS last night!
Ah, sorry, thought you meant the IP Cam Talk cameras. IPCT I guess! Are those rebadged Hiks or Dahua's ... or?
So... I think my question is if Hik/Dahua get blacklisted is there any manufacturer out there y’all would stand behind?
I’ve been installing Hik IP cameras for probably 10 years. I’ve sampled other makes, but never found anyone I liked in the same price bracket. Axis is great, but my customers would laugh me out the door if I tried to sell them cameras at $499/each.
Any thoughts?
Btw, here’s the email I got from Hik this morning in response to the NYT article: