Reolink: Deconstruction of a dangerous misleading youtube review "Finding the BEST 4K Security Camera NVR Package (Reolink vs Amcrest vs Swann)"

mat200

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Jan 17, 2017
Messages
13,655
Reaction score
22,743
posted a new thread on:

Reolink Duo / Dual-Lens 150° FOV, 4MP/2K : review of nighttime image captures by securitybros
 

wittaj

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Apr 28, 2019
Messages
24,429
Reaction score
47,550
Location
USA
Some recent great threads by @mat200





 

wittaj

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Apr 28, 2019
Messages
24,429
Reaction score
47,550
Location
USA
Compliments of @samplenhold over in this thread, but thought it was good to add to our unofficial Reolink thread as well:

A house rehabber in Houston had about $2500 worth of brand-new appliances stolen out of a home he was working on. They had just been delivered a that afternoon, were still in the boxes, inside the locked house.

But fear not, he has video of the whole thing, courtesy of Reolink!

Now really, can you tell me anything about this entity? Human? Male? Female?

Reolink 1.JPG



I guess you can tell the truck is a Toyota Tundra. But the guy walking to the back yard is barely visible.

Reolink 3.JPG



This shot has this guy barely moving. Not going to get any ID here.

Reolink 4.JPG



Well to give the Reolink some slack, this guy was actually running to the truck.

Reolink 5.JPG



Here is the cam mounted way too high:
Reolink 2.JPG



This is a Reolink WIFI cam with a solar panel to power it.
Reolink 6.JPG
 

brisvegas

n3wb
Joined
Jul 12, 2022
Messages
6
Reaction score
9
Location
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
looks like there was a firmware update on the cams.. i dont get anywhere near the level of ghosting i used to get. this is with a black shirt on, against a wet exposed ag driveway.. (this particular combo used to freak out the compression algorithm)
1672985932262.png
and while moving.. not great, but its way better than it was last year when i tested..

still havent really played with the contrast ect..bottom of my leg is gone, but also had black shoes/socks.. and that shin was just coming into frame as im walking.. can can easily make out the writing on my shirt.. - wouldnt have been able to do this at all before update.
my left arm looks distorted as im holding mail i just got from the letterbox.

distance from cam to perp was about 4-5 meters.

all in all still happy with my purchase..

on another note.. my parents are looking to put cctv in.. they live on acreage.. so very low light performance needed.. can someone recommend a decently priced pvr+4 cam kit?
 

wittaj

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Apr 28, 2019
Messages
24,429
Reaction score
47,550
Location
USA
Reolink ranked number one again for 2023 LOL



NYtimes was having none of that Reolink stuff and instead went with Arlo as the number 1 camera for 2023

 

BORIStheBLADE

Getting comfortable
Joined
Feb 14, 2016
Messages
739
Reaction score
2,065
Location
North Texas
Reolink ranked number one again for 2023 LOL



NYtimes was having none of that Reolink stuff and instead went with Arlo as the number 1 camera for 2023

Ignorance is bliss for a lot..
 

JKLman

n3wb
Joined
Dec 22, 2017
Messages
4
Reaction score
3
In this video at 10:18 he shows Reolinks very very bad images when it is dark. And he says something like "it does not matter since in all pictures (even Dahua) you can not identify a person". That is true in HIS lightning conditions. But if light was just a little better maybe the Dahua could give a very good picture and still the Reolinks would probably still be bad.

Stuff like this makes me 100% feel like he is paid (or want to be paid) by Reolink.
 
Last edited:

mat200

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Jan 17, 2017
Messages
13,655
Reaction score
22,743
In this video he shows Reolinks very very bad images when it is dark. And he says something like "it does not matter since in all pictures (even Dahua) you can not identify a person". That is true in HIS lightning conditions. But if light was just a little better maybe the Dahua could give a very good picture and still the Reolinks would probably still be bad.

Stuff like this makes me 100% feel like he is paid (or want to be paid) by Reolink.
Also . the local LEO may actually recognize some suspects - so in that case a better image capture, even if it does not fully meet Identification standards can be useful.
 

wittaj

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Apr 28, 2019
Messages
24,429
Reaction score
47,550
Location
USA
In this video at 10:18 he shows Reolinks very very bad images when it is dark. And he says something like "it does not matter since in all pictures (even Dahua) you can not identify a person". That is true in HIS lightning conditions. But if light was just a little better maybe the Dahua could give a very good picture and still the Reolinks would probably still be bad.

Stuff like this makes me 100% feel like he is paid (or want to be paid) by Reolink.
Yep, it lead to my post here talking and demonstrating how he was using a great camera on default settings and the wrong focal length that resulted in the issues with the better cameras:


And that then led to the creation of this thread:

 

wittaj

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Apr 28, 2019
Messages
24,429
Reaction score
47,550
Location
USA
Just adding a few recent threads where folks came to this forum after being burned by Reolinks providing useless video:




1677942027213.png
 

wittaj

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Apr 28, 2019
Messages
24,429
Reaction score
47,550
Location
USA
^Exactly - it shows how much light is needed on these consumer grade cameras that put in less than ideal MP/sensor combo's. And unless it is daytime sun, these cameras will struggle.

I am sure a Dahua 5442 would do well in color with that amount of light.
 

Andreszz

Young grasshopper
Joined
Jul 11, 2016
Messages
35
Reaction score
2
Why are there so many attacks to Reolink? Reolink systems are great, but it is not intended to be used with BlueIris for a professional security system.

Reolink makes home appliances that are so good that they shadow some professional cameras.

The Web client and the phone app are the best and easiest to use, for non-professionals.

You buy an LUMUS, argus 3 PRO or E1 pro, place over the table, and in 5 minutes you have a great security system !

If you know how to connect your Bluetooth headphones to the phone, you can install your security system in 5 minutes!

It's an incredible camera because of the image clarity, color night vision, motion detection with the PIR sensor, 4G GSM cameras !

Yes, the 12 MP are not worth it, some professional-grade cameras have better images, yes. Extreme conditions, such as day or night, are not ideal. But you are comparing Peras with Bannas.

I use arround 20 Reolink cameras in the last 8 years and never had a issue.
 

wittaj

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Apr 28, 2019
Messages
24,429
Reaction score
47,550
Location
USA
Why are there so many attacks to Reolink? Reolink systems are great, but it is not intended to be used with BlueIris for a professional security system.

Reolink makes home appliances that are so good that they shadow some professional cameras.

The Web client and the phone app are the best and easiest to use, for non-professionals.

You buy an LUMUS, argus 3 PRO or E1 pro, place over the table, and in 5 minutes you have a great security system !

If you know how to connect your Bluetooth headphones to the phone, you can install your security system in 5 minutes!

It's an incredible camera because of the image clarity, color night vision, motion detection with the PIR sensor, 4G GSM cameras !

Yes, the 12 MP are not worth it, some professional-grade cameras have better images, yes. Extreme conditions, such as day or night, are not ideal. But you are comparing Peras with Bannas.

I use arround 20 Reolink cameras in the last 8 years and never had a issue.
Yes their web app is decent and the little table camera might be ok for watching pets and stuff. But folks are here for good captures at night when perps are out, and that is where these cameras fail.

That simplicity of connecting for a "Security system" in 5 minutes comes at a cost of having a non-secure network.

The issue this whole thread is about is the night quality. Take Blue Iris out of the equation and the night quality still sucks.

Have you not looked thru the 19 pages here - nobody has been able to provide a clean capture at night of a moving object with a reolink.

Based on all these images in this thread where someone tried to provide their best capture, nobody here will agree with your sentence "It's an incredible camera because of the image clarity, color night vision, motion detection with the PIR sensor, 4G GSM cameras"

So put your evidence to the test here - prove this thread wrong and provide your best video of a person moving at night and prove to us that someone can freeze frame and get better than a ghost/blur motion with someone in motion. We have been waiting a long time to see a nice clean capture at night with motion from a Reolink.
 
Last edited:

looney2ns

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Sep 25, 2016
Messages
15,521
Reaction score
22,657
Location
Evansville, In. USA
Why are there so many attacks to Reolink? Reolink systems are great, but it is not intended to be used with BlueIris for a professional security system.

Reolink makes home appliances that are so good that they shadow some professional cameras.

The Web client and the phone app are the best and easiest to use, for non-professionals.

You buy an LUMUS, argus 3 PRO or E1 pro, place over the table, and in 5 minutes you have a great security system !

If you know how to connect your Bluetooth headphones to the phone, you can install your security system in 5 minutes!

It's an incredible camera because of the image clarity, color night vision, motion detection with the PIR sensor, 4G GSM cameras !

Yes, the 12 MP are not worth it, some professional-grade cameras have better images, yes. Extreme conditions, such as day or night, are not ideal. But you are comparing Peras with Bannas.

I use arround 20 Reolink cameras in the last 8 years and never had a issue.
Because they are horrible. You apparently have never seen what a "real" camera can do.
 

Andreszz

Young grasshopper
Joined
Jul 11, 2016
Messages
35
Reaction score
2
Yes their web app is decent and the little table camera might be ok for watching pets and stuff. But folks are here for good captures at night when perps are out, and that is where these cameras fail.

That simplicity of connecting for a "Security system" in 5 minutes comes at a cost of having a non-secure network.

The issue this whole thread is about is the night quality. Take Blue Iris out of the equation and the night quality still sucks.

Have you not looked thru the 19 pages here - nobody has been able to provide a clean capture at night of a moving object with a reolink.

Based on all these images in this thread where someone tried to provide their best capture, nobody here will agree with your sentence "It's an incredible camera because of the image clarity, color night vision, motion detection with the PIR sensor, 4G GSM cameras"

So put your evidence to the test here - prove this thread wrong and provide your best video of a person moving at night and prove to us that someone can freeze frame and get better than a ghost/blur motion with someone in motion. We have been waiting a long time to see a nice clean capture at night with motion from a Reolink.
Yes I also rather a hikvision 5MP video quality, but I can setup in a house 8 reolink cameras in 10 minuts and have a full video and alarm system.
I am not an expert nor can I make an exhaustive review. i just save some videos from phone app.
But for me the cameras fulfill their purpose.
  • Push notification on the phone 5 to 10 seconds.
  • never a false alarm from PIR
  • Enough resolution to recognize a face.
  • 5 min to setup.

RLC - 410
Lumus 1080p
Reolink GO (old 1080p) 4G GSM battery
 

wittaj

IPCT Contributor
Joined
Apr 28, 2019
Messages
24,429
Reaction score
47,550
Location
USA
Thanks for sharing the videos.

None of us here would want a 5MP Hikvision as it wouldn't be on the ideal MP/sensor ratio LOL.

OK, so all of your examples are inside where you are benefiting from light bounce off the walls, and yeah most cameras can do ok in that situation.

The complaining here is about outside performance at night where you do not benefit from IR bounce off of white walls.

So basically you are telling us you are ok with your 8 cameras setup in the house in under 10 minutes that you probably used a QR code to scan and as such the cameras are touching the internet for anyone to hack into them or use your router as a BOT attack....

The RLC-410 is a tight hallway with a lot of IR bounce with the person right on top of the camera. Any camera can do well in this situation.

1680480967746.png



The LUMUS field of view is tough with that counter or cabinet absorbing most of the light.

1680480759698.png



The old Reolink is middle of the day with a lot of light and struggled:

1680481063209.png
 
Top