Mike A.
Known around here
- May 6, 2017
- 4,045
- 6,789
As far as that is concerned, I would imagine that all they really need is to keep track of the original code cross-referenced to the serial number. I doubt that most folks change the numbers.Welp, I’m seeing reports that they have back up combinations for manual S&G locks as well?
I have no love for Liberty Safe. I think what they did was pretty stupid and should have said they wouldn't provide any information without a subpoena.
That being said, none of these "home safes" are secure or fireproof. The law enforcement agency could have just as easily broken into the safe in about 5 minutes with the right tools. So while I completely agree with people freaking out about Liberty Safe's eagerness to provide the information, I also have to laugh when those people say how much less secure those safes are because there is a "master list" of codes that could be leaked in a hack, etc. Your home safe is no less secure if the entire world knows your combination because the safe isn't very secure in the first place!
And I would add C) to keep non-burglarers away from whatever you put in the safe. Like kids, kid's friends, grandkids, party goers, people in your house to do repairs or cleaning, spouses.But I think most buy a safe to A) keep valuables away from most burglars who 90%+ of the time use brute force and pry bars and while that might work, time is not their friend , and B) to help protect valuables in case of fire.
I'm not an attorney, EDIT - but apparently I am an idiot . Everything said after this is likely incorrect)FWIW - in the USA .. if the Government breaks into the safe, there are now damages to the owner of the safe .. without damages, you can not get "standing" in court .. so there is something to be said of forcing someone to "break-in" vs "walk-in"
I'm not an attorney, but I would have to assume that if the law enforcement agency asked the individual for the code/combination to the safe so they could conduct their search (which was authorized by a legitimate search warrant and covered the contents of said safe) and they refused to provide it or provided an incorrect number, the government wouldn't be responsible for any damages to the safe from that point on.
That is what the DOJ would argue .. and the Defense Attorney would argue against that logic ..
Remember the 5th amendment protects what is in your mind .. so you are NOT compelled to give up the combo .. and the Government claiming you should have given up your 5th amendment is as offensive to those who believe in liberty as is giving up your 1st, 2nd, 4th amendment rights ..
as is right now, depending on the Judge and Jury I could see it land either way .. depends .. DOJ and FBI have gotten away with many things that I could not have imagined in the past ..
ref:
In Doe v. United States, the United States Supreme Court held that a combination to a wall safe is considered testimonial because recalling the passcode forces a defendant to reveal a product of his mind.
anything electronic can be passively hacked or rendered useless.
you need mechanical devices that can only be breached by physical forces, and that only takes time.
Hello, everyone!
Could you please tell me where it is best to place a video surveillance camera on a two-story building? I have 2 options: above the front door or above the second floor?
And I'm also interested to know what you think about the fingerprint recognition system? How reliable is it?
So is this only for the keypad safes or all of their safes?
I havent been able to find that answer yet either... Im assuming all even with S&G mechanical locks
we could start a keypad exchange with random users