Most of everything is speculation right now (and may remain so for the next 60 years like with JFK). But one video I watched showed the first three shots were close to trump. The remaining were more "wild" into the crowd.
Sorry. Been reading hundreds of threads and watching hours of video lately and probably missed it.
Because I have a working brain, I am open to the idea that someone took advantage of a lapse in security. Because I have a working brain, I'm able to evaluate all possibilities rather than base my opinion on a fictional character on a tv show, even if that show is a good one. As I posted earlier, the logistics involved with such a large scale planned assassination makes that idea highly unlikely. "They" would have to recruit not only a number of local, state, and federal employees, it would need to be the right employees. In addition, they would have to be 100% accurate in evaluating people for recruiting. They can't settle for people who don't like Trump, they need people willing to help have him killed. Because if they are wrong once, there's now someone who knows about their plan but doesn't agree with it. In other words, a potential leak. If you could recruit 100 mechanics, you've still not got a good plan. Some need to be counter snipers. Some need to be agents guarding Trump. And then once you've got enough of the right people recruited, you have to make sure they are all on the roster to work that date. And all of that needs to be done on short notice. In order to get state and locals on board with the plan, you have to know what state and locals to get on board. That means you would only have had from when they scheduled the rally to get all that done. Personally, I don't believe the federal government is that accurate and efficient. Maybe you have more faith in the feds than I do.
Dude, that' guy's about as far away from divine as one can get. If it was intervention... it was to hasten the end of the world.
Sounds like planning a war to me. The less you recruit the less chance of a whistleblowers. You could have One Rogue SS kill Trump, planned or not planned...
No way, that sounds like Communism at work...hahaha
You've introduced a number of variables. Create an atmosphere. I think the Dems have done that. I believe that, along with the lapse in security, is what caused this. And it's not one well placed guy on the ground. You have to include state and local police. The feds don't control who the state and locals pick for their details so their higher ups need to be in on it. And not just any of them, the specific ones that do the planning. The holes in butler were with both the feds and local police.
But that's not what happened. The problem is people are labeling the attempted assassination as a conspiracy. Ok. He's what I feel would need to have taken place for it to be a conspiracy and I don't believe it's plausible. If there's another way to get to the known result, I'll be happy to listen to it.Sounds like planning a war to me. The less you recruit the less chance of a whistleblowers. You could have One Rogue SS kill Trump, planned or not planned...
I would hire you for my security though...
I fully agree. YT as with other platforms have created a very easy way to push someone in any direction the regime wants. It is much different than in the 60s. So many want their one minute of fame, add the extreme lack of caring about others lives and you got your assassin.
I understand what you're saying. The problem is that what you're saying doesn't allow what actually happened to happen. The area the kid shot from was outside of the control of the feds. The local police were in that area. So no matter what any or all of the feds set up or allowed, either the locals were in on it or it was simply a lapse in security. And if the locals were in on it, we're back to recruiting locals with 100% accuracy on short notice. If the security lapse had been only on the SS and the shooter had made it inside the SS's perimeter, your theory would hold water.
That is not true. The SS was totally in charge of all security decisions. From deciding who would be there (SS, State Police or local PD), where they would be located, what hardware they had (think no drones), communications, metal detectors, etc. The SS was in charge. This bullshit that the SS director was saying about it being 'outside' the SS security perimeter was total PR. Same with the 'sloped roof' crap. She was making things up as she went along thinking that no one would call her on it.
In the planning, that area was delegated to local police, not the feds. Local police, not the feds, were in the building watching out of the window. Local police, not the feds, took the picture of the shooter in the demolition ranch shirt. The feds do not have full control over what hardware locals could or could not use. Feds do not regulate the local's communication. The feds do not control how many officers the locals can use. If the locals had 30 officers to put in that area, they could put 30 officers in that area.
