Best Cameras for under $150

Another one at a shopping center I put up around 20' in the air over looking parking lot and entrance
 
fenderman said:
The video I linked to was uploaded to youtube as well. You image looks like complete shit.
Click to expand...
Might not be the $200 junk you have but I have yet to make any settings adjustments either, I am sure you messed with yours, give me time we will be equal but I pay less for the same if not better. Don't be jealous
 
ron351 said:
Might not be the $200 junk you have but I have yet to make any settings adjustments either, I am sure you messed with yours, give me time we will be equal but I pay less for the same if not better. Don't be jealous
Click to expand...
You are a lying scammer. You have been busted for the fraud you are. Fixed starlight turrets are available for 100 bux.
 
@ron351 & @Thomas
Please send one of your cameras to Fenderman or Looney for free to test. They have tested many cameras over the years. This would be an opportunity for someone with 100% credibility on this forum to examine the cameras. Not much of a capital outlay on Thomas's part.
 
Adamsdaddy said:
@ron351 & @Thomas
Please send one of your cameras to Fenderman or Looney for free to test. They have tested many cameras over the years. This would be an opportunity for someone with 100% credibility on this forum to examine the cameras. Not much of a capital outlay on Thomas's part.
Click to expand...
I dont want his camera. You need to understand that the video from the backyard is doctored. Think logically for a second, do you think that these china scammer has access to a sensor that can accomplish this for 30 dollars but the major players in china and the US dont? The cameras that can do this cost serious money.
 
fenderman said:
I dont want his camera. You need to understand that the video from the backyard is doctored. Think logically for a second, do you think that these china scammer has access to a sensor that can accomplish this for 30 dollars but the major players in china and the US dont? The cameras that can do this cost serious money.
Click to expand...
I am telling you it is not doctored up and you will feel foolish when I get up to my sisters one night to prove it. Don't make yourself look like a fool until I say here is the proof, and when I do if you still claim it is doctored you will only be fooling yourself.
 
ron351 said:
I am telling you it is not doctored up and you will feel foolish when I get up to my sisters one night to prove it. Don't make yourself look like a fool until I say here is the proof, and when I do if you still claim it is doctored you will only be fooling yourself.
Click to expand...
lol, you a kidding yourself. The image looks like crap and will look worse once there is movement.
 
fenderman said:
Here is what a dahua 5231 looks like. Note the car is traveling much faster than the people walking.
Click to expand...

Talk about street light look at the light in yours. LOL Now show it in your back yard like I will at my sisters where there is no light, just a distant light and we can see how crappy yours does in very low light and no white light and no LEDs
 
ron351 said:
Talk about street light look at the light in yours. LOL Now show it in your back yard like I will at my sisters where there is no light, just a distant light and we can see how crappy yours does in very low light and no white light and no LEDs
Click to expand...
That is not my footage. The images from your "sister's" backyard are 1) horrible 2) the fake daytime like image is manipulated by the camera firmware increasing the shutter to 1/3 or similar to get that effect. Any motion will result in blur.
 
fenderman said:
That is not my footage. The images from your "sister's" backyard are 1) horrible 2) the fake daytime like image is manipulated by the camera firmware increasing the shutter to 1/3 or similar to get that effect. Any motion will result in blur.
Click to expand...
Ok you know it all, superior to all on here, no need for me to prove you wrong, you just do not accept truth in what you see. Move on to the next post as I will. I am done and will appreciate what better image I have then you do. Good luck in the stone age of cameras.
 
ron351 said:
Ok you know it all, superior to all on here, no need for me to prove you wrong, you just do not accept truth in what you see. Move on to the next post as I will. I am done and will appreciate what better image I have then you do. Good luck in the stone age of cameras.
Click to expand...
So what happened, you could not produce the video?
 
I've seen some cams recently that overlay the IR image onto the low-light color image.
IE, even tho the cam is in color mode at night, it's ALSO picking up the IR to enhance the apparent brightness.
Use the IR 'brightness' to boost the color saturation and viola, looks like daytime (sort of).

But does that help you identify someone walking by? I dunno...
 
I'm curious as well about the new IPCT 2/4/8mp cams vs the trusted X231s. I'm torn since I do already have a Hik camera from the old house, but have a spot where I might trade off a smidge of low light performance for a better pixel count. Even though it's a little over $150, has anyone reviewed the 8MP IPC-HFW5831RE-I darkfighter? If it's nearly as good as a 2MP (which it looks to be on paper) I could get by with spending $180 instead of $250 on two separate cams.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom