Those are older systems but some are suitable so it depends on how many cams, resolution and frame rates..@fenderman ok you and cb seem to be the main ones to go to on BI and hardware so not that times have change what hardware would you recommend I only ask cause I have a hook up with a company that refurbishes Dells and pretty much can get it for nothing. Here is a link I was looking at the last one but I have the ability to get pretty much anything not listed on the page just have to ask when I since I see them everyday
I guess the BI fab has rub off on me watching this thread
Thanks
With Intel Core i Series
10-4 is ram important I should I stick with 8 going to be running 8 cameras all 4 mp 24x7 with exception to on which can be on motion.Those are older systems but some are suitable so it depends on how many cams, resolution and frame rates..
I would spend a bit more and look at much newer skylake/kaby lake systems...
You will want a modern i7 skylake (also not that skylake allows h.265 hardware acceleration eventually when BI adds it, HA is limited to h.264 now)...ram is important. Blue iris and CPU consumption as it relates to memory usage10-4 is ram important I should I stick with 8 going to be running 8 cameras all 4 mp 24x7 with exception to on which can be on motion.
No. blue iris uses intel hd hardware acceleration (must support quicksync)@fenderman I'm a long time user of SecuritySpy on macOS and I love it but not all of my clients have a Mac they want to dedicate to surveillance. With that setup route CPU is the primary focus as the GPU is only used if you are viewing any cameras locally within the app. Is that the same with BI? I've been meaning to test a setup with BI for several years now and I think it's time to get some experience with it under my belt.
Quick Sync is a feature of the CPU though, so wouldn't that be in agreement with what I asked?No. blue iris uses intel hd hardware acceleration (must support quicksync)
no its a feature of the onboard HD acceleration...Quick Sync is a feature of the CPU though, so wouldn't that be in agreement with what I asked?
Which is a dedicated core on the CPU. Sorry, I'm not trying to argue details...just trying to get clarity on BI using CPU as the primary (I count CPU with HD accelerated integrated graphics processing as "CPU") resource. Coming from another direction, I suppose I should have asked more about the importance/necessity of a higher end GPU. If Quick Sync the only acceleration option that BI uses, then I would say that a higher end GPU would not be of benefit. Am I correct in this? Thank you!no its a feature of the onboard HD acceleration...
No it is separate and distinct from the cpu and does not use cpu cylces.....A discreet card will reduce performance...Use Intel hd with quick sync .. There are many threads discussing this...Which is a dedicated core on the CPU. Sorry, I'm not trying to argue details...just trying to get clarity on BI using CPU as the primary (I count CPU with HD accelerated integrated graphics processing as "CPU") resource. Coming from another direction, I suppose I should have asked more about the importance/necessity of a higher end GPU. If Quick Sync the only acceleration option that BI uses, then I would say that a higher end GPU would not be of benefit. Am I correct in this? Thank you!
I appreciate your feedback even though we're misunderstanding each other. I will continue researching BI and what it does and doesn't benefit from hardware-wise. For clarification, I'm talking about the CPU as a chip, the piece of hardware on the motherboard. Quick Sync is on that chip, the CPU. It's not using cycles, but it's on the physical CPU. What I'm gathering is that BI uses hardware acceleration only via this hardware and an added GPU (nvidia/ati) would not be beneficial. Thank you again, I really do appreciate your responses and I look forward to learning more about BI through testing.
That processor can easily run your load...the demo is on the website..just install the full install file and you get 15 days..note that direct to disk does not work on the demo so you will see high cpu usage..I'm running 10 cameras (8 Dahua starlight turrets, 1 dahua starlight dome, and an old Hik) and I've got an idle PC with an Intel i5-4690k processor (3.5Ghz, 4 cores/4 threads, 4th gen devils canyon architecture); it supports QuickSync. 16 GB ram, SSD startup disk, WD spinny drive.
I'm seeing lots of variation in what people think is required -- does this seem like a reasonable machine to run for my camera count?
I presume BI has a demo I can install to evaluate?
My Dahua NVR is almost completely useless as it reboots > 20 times per day, so I'm hoping something like BI would actually be a good option. I've sunk over $1400 in cameras, and unless the NVR side of things works that's pretty much money down the toilet.
That processor can easily run your load...the demo is on the website..just install the full install file and you get 15 days..note that direct to disk does not work on the demo so you will see high cpu usage..
When you enable Direct-to-disk you loose Blue Iris' ability to time and date stamp your video. To regain this functionality, log into each camera and enable...
Advanced Config > Image > OSD Settings (Tab)
...and the result will be that each camera will time/datestamp the videp it produces...however...you then run into the problem of synchronizing the time on each of your cameras. Here's a nifty clue to solve that issue...
Seems very high for the cpu and the load....are you logging in remotely? are you certain you enabled d2d and HA for every camera?Just upgraded to an 8th generation I7 8700 with 16GB of DDR4 3200 memory. Running 11 cams as of now: Two 4MP, one 3MP, seven 2MP and one 1MP. The 3MP, the two 4MP and six of the 2MP cams are running at full resolution and 30FPS. One 2MP and the one 1MP are running VGA at 15 FPS. CPU load from Blue Iris (service) runs 35%-40%. Hardware acceleration and direct to disk are enabled.
CPU: $360
Mobo: $115 (ASRock Z370M Pro4), after MIR
Memory: $165
I had the rest.