triumph202
Pulling my weight
I've got a lot more knowledge of still photography and totally agree the depth of field from what's a f1.6 lens is astounding. However, I would expect they'd get infinity focus correct- they can't "guesstimate" somebody won't care the focus sucks past ~12 metres on a 6mm lens!It seems to me we're kindof used to, and expect, an infinite depth of focus in these camera lenses - something we don't expect or get with a normal handheld camera.
There is presumably a design compromise between a small aperture, which gives a larger depth of focus but reduced amount of light, and a larger aperture, which gives more light but a reduced depth of focus.
So perhaps the lenses on the ULL camera have moved towards the 'maximise the light end' giving a more obvious finite depth of focus.
So in the case of your camera, you have just tweaked the setpoint out further than the factory-set compromise.
I have to say that, being familiar with how you have to compromise with a handheld camera, I've always been impressed with the depth of focus that's normally achieved with your average IP surveillance camera.
It's getting dark here now and the images at night are vastly improved. The Starlight isn't aimed at exactly the same point (to do direct comparisons) but what I see now is more what I expected to get from the Hik.
@aster1x I can put some photos up later. I can tell you the f1.2 lenses I was talking about are around 32mm long, the current lens is more like 17mm - so no way that will fit. There are f1.5 lenses that are the right length, but who knows how good they will be?