triumph202
Pulling my weight
It seems to me we're kindof used to, and expect, an infinite depth of focus in these camera lenses - something we don't expect or get with a normal handheld camera.
There is presumably a design compromise between a small aperture, which gives a larger depth of focus but reduced amount of light, and a larger aperture, which gives more light but a reduced depth of focus.
So perhaps the lenses on the ULL camera have moved towards the 'maximise the light end' giving a more obvious finite depth of focus.
So in the case of your camera, you have just tweaked the setpoint out further than the factory-set compromise.
I have to say that, being familiar with how you have to compromise with a handheld camera, I've always been impressed with the depth of focus that's normally achieved with your average IP surveillance camera.
I've got a lot more knowledge of still photography and totally agree the depth of field from what's a f1.6 lens is astounding. However, I would expect they'd get infinity focus correct- they can't "guesstimate" somebody won't care the focus sucks past ~12 metres on a 6mm lens!
It's getting dark here now and the images at night are vastly improved. The Starlight isn't aimed at exactly the same point (to do direct comparisons) but what I see now is more what I expected to get from the Hik.
@aster1x I can put some photos up later. I can tell you the f1.2 lenses I was talking about are around 32mm long, the current lens is more like 17mm - so no way that will fit. There are f1.5 lenses that are the right length, but who knows how good they will be?