mat200
IPCT Contributor
- Jan 17, 2017
- 15,103
- 25,509
Unfortunately in hindsight those 4 channels weren't what the elected leaders were listening to. The official scientific spokesman Dr. Fauci was downplaying the risk until at least mid-March. Trump started the China travel ban in late January as soon as WHO said covid was a national emergency. That's when covid changed from a medical issue to a political issue. Anything and everything Trump did was declared as harmful by the democrats, so no matter where you stand there's a large group of experts to support you, and a different large group to oppose you. With two esteemed groups saying opposite things, there are of course some who were right and some who were wrong. If you listened to Pelosi on Feb 24 encouraging "everybody" to come to Chinatown, that was the wrong choice. Likewise if you listened to Fauci on Feb 29 saying that malls, movies, and gyms were ok, that was a bad pick. Ditto for DeBlasio encouraging New Yorkers to get out on the town on March 24. If you listened to the 4 channels you cited, you made the correct choice.Seriously, if ALL 4 of the channels I noted called this a Pandemic before our "elected leaders" did.. well, that says a lot.
Great idea, try on various masks to determine which ones you like and put the ones back that you don't like...
View attachment 66638
ps - heard there are condom shops also... wonder if they have a try on before you buy option...
Unfortunately in hindsight those 4 channels weren't what the elected leaders were listening to. The official scientific spokesman Dr. Fauci was downplaying the risk until at least mid-March. Trump started the China travel ban in late January as soon as WHO said covid was a national emergency. That's when covid changed from a medical issue to a political issue. Anything and everything Trump did was declared as harmful by the democrats, so no matter where you stand there's a large group of experts to support you, and a different large group to oppose you. With two esteemed groups saying opposite things, there are of course some who were right and some who were wrong. If you listened to Pelosi on Feb 24 encouraging "everybody" to come to Chinatown, that was the wrong choice. Likewise if you listened to Fauci on Feb 29 saying that malls, movies, and gyms were ok, that was a bad pick. Ditto for DeBlasio encouraging New Yorkers to get out on the town on March 24. If you listened to the 4 channels you cited, you made the correct choice.
Unfortunately in hindsight those 4 channels weren't what the elected leaders were listening to. The official scientific spokesman Dr. Fauci was downplaying the risk until at least mid-March. Trump started the China travel ban in late January as soon as WHO said covid was a national emergency. That's when covid changed from a medical issue to a political issue. Anything and everything Trump did was declared as harmful by the democrats, so no matter where you stand there's a large group of experts to support you, and a different large group to oppose you. With two esteemed groups saying opposite things, there are of course some who were right and some who were wrong. If you listened to Pelosi on Feb 24 encouraging "everybody" to come to Chinatown, that was the wrong choice. Likewise if you listened to Fauci on Feb 29 saying that malls, movies, and gyms were ok, that was a bad pick. Ditto for DeBlasio encouraging New Yorkers to get out on the town on March 24. If you listened to the 4 channels you cited, you made the correct choice.
You just described a government job!If my job performance was similar to some of those, I would be terminated.
Seriously, this is not a joking matter...
Cases are important but aren't just specifically tied to tests exactly. It's a different reporting stream. So the botched test data doesn't necessarily mean botched case data. For example my wife is a case based on doctor evaluation but the swab was negative at the hospital (doc said relatively short period of detection by swab, and she was apparently two weeks in by then). Still waiting for earlier test result nearly two weeks after it was collected.Positivity % isnt what makes the headlines. Cases do. Who would want those to be higher? (Nancy? Chuck? Joe?...)
Cases are important but aren't just specifically tied to tests exactly. It's a different reporting stream. So the botched test data doesn't necessarily mean botched case data. For example my wife is a case based on doctor evaluation but the swab was negative at the hospital (doc said relatively short period of detection by swab, and she was apparently two weeks in by then). Still waiting for earlier test result nearly two weeks after it was collected.
States with diluted positivity data are mostly "fast reopening proponents" I think Texas, Florida, Georgia. Maybe Pennsylvania too (PA aren't fast reopening though).
It's easy to assume I'll intent but this may be incompetence instead, but the dilution of positivity plays right into the Republican playbook it seems.
Sent from my ONEPLUS A6013 using Tapatalk
HI @BobRegnar
Re: The VA ..... sigh, they really should be doing a better job... oh well, guess they just do not care much about vets...
You should be even more pro-mask if you really feel this way "I take it those with smart-ass replies aren't struggling to feed their families or pay their rent or losing their small business to the lockdowns."
Seriously, this is not a joking matter. The information you are getting is pure BULL.
Lockdowns would not need to happen had we controlled this as well as Taiwan. They use masks to help control it. Seriously, look at how well they are doing and what they are doing differently.
We as a society threw away numerous opportunities to manage this better... and are now paying the price.
Masks reducing O2 levels... not in any significant manner for the masks we are talking about. The data and science is there.
The sources you are looking at and believing are incorrect and misleading.
Look for those who actually do scientific tests on the subject.
Here's better sources for you:
MedCram youtube
Dr Mike Hansen
Dr John Campbell
Peak Prosperity
And they've f'ed up royally since the start of this.... this is why I really do not consider them leaders anymore, but managers who follow.
Seriously, if ALL 4 of the channels I noted called this a Pandemic before our "elected leaders" did.. well, that says a lot.
All the "elected leaders" are slow on this game... they did not understand the logarithmic function of the spread of this.. had to move quick and decisively, which they clearly are not able to do.
"Re: The VA ..... sigh, they really should be doing a better job... oh well, guess they just do not care much about vets..."
Hardly what I meant by posting that. Funny though. The VA is under unusual scrutiny nowadays to perform to standards. I'm pretty sure it's not much different with those employees than anywhere else. I'm certain Walmart is ever more careless.
"The sources you are looking at and believing are incorrect and misleading.
Look for those who actually do scientific tests on the subject."
What do you think the Hanoi study I put up is? It is scientific, unbiased, peer reviewed. What's incorrect and misleading about it?
The mindset to dismiss everything that doesn't lineup exactly with our beliefs isn't scientific.