tencent leaked some info
According to the report, late on Saturday evening, Tencent, on its webpage titled "Epidemic Situation Tracker", showed confirmed cases of novel coronavirus (2019nCoV) in China as standing at 154,023, 10 times the official figure at the time. It listed the number of suspected cases as 79,808, four times the official figure.
And while the number of cured cases was only 269, well below the official number that day of 300, most ominously, the death toll listed was 24,589, vastly higher than the 300 officially listed that day.
View attachment 55162
Tencent screengrab as of late Feb 1, showing far higher infections.
Moments later, Tencent updated the numbers to reflect the government's "official" numbers that day.
View attachment 55163
...
This led many in the mainland to speculate that Tencent has two sets of data, the real data and "processed" data.
In short, two camps have emerged: one, the more optimistic, speculates that a coding problem could be causing the real "internal" data to accidentally appear. The other, far more pessimistically inclined, believes that someone behind the scenes is trying to leak the real numbers, as "the "internal" data held by Beijing may not reflect the true extent of the epidemic."
In the original vector yes. In humans, hopefully we can vaccinate against it. I am hoping the fear will give us the courage to find a good vaccine for general corona viruses, which would be very useful. Fear is the only stick that works to get things done.Wondering if this virus is now going to be around forever....
Holy smokes!
24.6/154 = 0.16 or 16% death rate... that's crazy.
( note - the official numbers are clearly significantly off )
According to the report, late on Saturday evening, Tencent, on its webpage titled "Epidemic Situation Tracker", showed confirmed cases of novel coronavirus (2019nCoV) in China as standing at 154,023, 10 times the official figure at the time. It listed the number of suspected cases as 79,808, four times the official figure.
And while the number of cured cases was only 269, well below the official number that day of 300, most ominously, the death toll listed was 24,589, vastly higher than the 300 officially listed that day.
Your numbers don't make sense. We have three figures to work from : 1) Total infected 2) Total Dead 3) Total Recovered.
Dead and recovered are absolute numbers, Total Infected is an unknown because we don't know what the outcome will be.
The kill rate formula should be (Total Dead + Total Recovered) / Total Dead
As it currently stands, 565 Dead + 1173 Recovered = 1738 known outcomes / 565 = 32.5% Death Rate.
It is currently falling fast. Death rate a few days ago was over 50%
Someone in the media or something used the total infected number to come up with a death rate.... because it looks better that way.. but its stupid because if you want to lower the death rate, all you have to do is infect more people.. makes no sense.
@Murphy625 - The CFR (case fatality rate) is not calculated by dividing deaths by recovered. The CFR is deaths/infections. As of today:
- Govt stats 565 dead / 28,274 infected = CFR 2%
- Tencent data (I have no idea if this is real or bogus, but the Tencent infection rate is much closer to Lancet # than govt reported #) 24,589 deaths / 154,023 infections = 16% CFR.
The Tencent CFR of 16% seems too high to me. If it is that high, the world is in big trouble.
Early on in an epidemic, the CFR is not accurate, specially with a long incubation time because the CFR doesn't factor in the time of onset of the disease until the time of death. For example, if we know a new virus kills exactly 50% of people on exactly the 10th day of infection, and 1000 people are infected today, on the fifth day after they are infected the new virus CFR is 0% (0/1000). That is very misleading. On the 10th day when 500 die the CFR is 50% (500/1000).
While we still have a lot of people in the 2 week incubation period and 10 day or so death period, the CFR is going to be off a bit. As more time passes the time of onset to death becomes irrelevant. CFR can also go down as more infection data becomes known. For example, a year from now we if we find out that a ton of people got the coronavirus, but had no symptoms or only mild cold symptoms, the CFR will go down as the number of known deaths is divided by the larger number of known infections that occurred and were not initially reported/known.