I mentioned ARLO and RING, I am using these right now to view over the internet to avoid using reolink China server but how else can I do it, I have to download BI app and then do it that way through a VPN? It seemed much easier just to use the arlo and ring app and have the ability to set an alarm and speak which actually came in handy recently when people were doing some suspicious things on the property.
Hi TL
The Arlo and Ring products are just not reliable enough, nor is the quality of the images good enough.
The Arlo / Arlo Pro has an ID distance of 5.6 feet. YES, you got that right.. the camera needs to be < 5.6 feet away from the suspect to get 100 ppf or better, AS well as mounted low enough to get a chance at a good facial ID ( 8 feet or less )
Ring 720p products are similar.
1080p products are typically better - but with the super wide FOV which consumers love to purchase - also have very short ID distances. All of this for a rather pricey product.
Furthermore...
Security Camera System Minimal Viable Product requirements:
- 1) It must be Reliable.
- 2) It must be able to capture good enough images to potentially ID suspects.
- 3) It must be useful for evidence. [ thus date and time stamps are critical ]
What does this mean in practical terms?
Wired systems with local storage will be the most reliable. While some maybe able to get wifi cameras to work well enough it requires a significant investment in building and maintaining a quality wifi network, which most people are unwilling to learn and spend the resources to do. Wifi is also subject to interference ( common ) and even possible jamming ( less common ).
Quality cameras are required. 1080p+ The best way to determine if a camera is good is to test it and compare it to others. Megapixels is only one factor to look at, and does not in itself determine the quality of the image. That said, your search should avoid 720p and poorer spec'ed cameras, they tend to be the cheaper cameras and provide poorer results. Test both day time and night time.
Few consumer marketed cameras have date and time stamps. This is critical if you plan to use your video images for evidence.
[ good wired camera = In general either PoE ( Power over Ethernet ) using
cat5e/cat6 cable for digital, OR coax wire with power wires and BNC connectors for analog based systems. ]
...
Arlo / Arlo Pro - why they make poor security cameras: ( a lot of this also applies to the
Ring cameras )
There are a number of reasons, which apply to many consumer wire free products.
The Arlo / Arlo Pro system fail in 2 of the 3 minimal viable product categories for security cameras, and in the 3rd one does a poor job ( ID distance very short, night image poor ).
1) Poor resolution and wide FOV make for short ID distances
2) Poor reliability, cameras will disconnect from base station, base station needs periodic reboots, cloud service auth failures
3) Lag with cloud service
4) Issues with reliability of motion detection
5) Issues to lag before recording
6) Poor night vision
7) No embedded time stamp - thus videos are poor for evidence. ( Arlo, Ring, and Nest fail here )
8) Difficult to manage multiple clips for downloading from the cloud service.
9) Lag to access live view
10) Cameras do not have local storage - thus when disconnected to the base station they are unable to record events.
Note: Arlo base station has USB ports which were intended for future options, however reportedly Netgear did not enable local attached storage until the Arlo Pro base station came out. Arlo Pro 2 improves on the Arlo / Arlo Pro with 1080p resolution, which helps. However the system still suffers from numerous faults similar to it's prior versions, and only when the cameras are wired do you see significant functional improvements. At which point you may want to just install a PoE system.