Thank you, I have read this article. You can also read his more recent article:
Russia can export, but it can’t buy what it needs.
www.nytimes.com
I am not a specialist in politics and economics (although I have a higher economic education with honors), I will try to comment.
First of all, his articles are a product for "internal consumption" in the US, filled with victorious reports, although it was hard to expect otherwise.
1. "Russia's military failure in Ukraine has refuted almost all predictions." Is it really a failure? Both the first article and the second list the author's assumptions based on the assumptions of the "analysts", based on the assumptions of the bloggers. For example, that Putin planned to capture Kyiv in 48-72 hours. There were no such statements, and could not be. No matter how you feel about Putin, he took office not because of the politically relevant skin color, gender and sexual orientation, unlike ... and he understands the impossibility of occupying a metropolis at such a time.
There is a steady destruction of Ukrainian forces, and Western captured weapons are replenishing the reserves of the DPR troops. The remnants of the AZOV battalion are surrendering, they are waiting for a court and a military tribunal. True, in the Ukrainian and Western press this is neatly called "they have completed their mission." Missile strikes are carried out on the places of basing troops and warehouses with weapons coming from abroad.
2. Frankly, in Russia there is a shortage of foreign components for equipment. This provides opportunities for the organization of parallel imports and the development of Russian companies.
3. The author reports a ban on oil imports to the United States (nasty Putin raised prices at American gas stations). Interestingly, imports of fertilizers and titanium from Russia to the USA still continue?
5. "And Europe, in particular, has yet to impose an embargo on Russian oil, let alone do anything substantial to wean itself off dependence on Russian gas." Stupid Europeans for some reason want to live in warmth and are not ready to destroy their industry, although the leaders of their countries speak directly about the need to reduce heat in apartments, abandon cars in favor of bicycles and meat.
And another funny Russian anecdote.
"Vladimir Zelensky became the most influential person of 2022 according to Time magazine.
He influenced the size of the territory of Ukraine. And, by the way, of Russia too. Influenced the prices of gas and oil. On the prices of agricultural products and fertilizers. Influenced the trajectory of air routes in Eurasia. Influenced the rate of inflation in countries around the world.
Strongly influenced the entire next heating season in the Eurozone.
Thanks to him, Ukraine also won Eurovision.
There are no questions for Time, they are right.".