Hikvision's new 4MP 2-series

@aster1x Yes I have mine set @ 4M bit rate in the cameras and I'm not having any issues, not sure I saw any difference in quality when I changed from 2M recently. Thanks for your reply and explanation.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In my case all of my cameras are remote, so when I view them it is all over the internet and stream size does come in. It does not matter for recording locally besides I get less recording on my NVR. I need to have 100 days footage on average so stream size on 20-30 camera installs at a location matter to me. Also takes a lot longer to download footage lol.

As to my size streams here is a capture from two of the new 4mp cameras, one set to 4mp and the other to 2mp. Exact same style of view but obviously not exactly identical, and I am aware it varies greatly by scene but these scenes are a similar as can be.

4mp
attachment.php


2mp
attachment.php


These bounce around, 4mp as low as 130000 say and the 2mp as high as 30000 but still this seems like a major difference. I can store 5-6 times more 2mp footage than I can 4mp. As of yet I honestly cannot tell much of a difference in the 4mp image vs the 2mp when zooming in on license plates and such which is where I expected to see the improvement. Still testing and waiting to get the same vehicle at the same rough distance to see and compare side by side when zooming in.
 

Attachments

  • 4mp.JPG
    4mp.JPG
    15.4 KB · Views: 767
  • 2mp.JPG
    2mp.JPG
    15.1 KB · Views: 762
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: gwminor48
@Razer Apologies razer but you still do not mention the unit of your figures. You mention 130000. Is this bits per second? It can not be because this is a very low bit rate. The picture would be awfull. If the unit is bytes per pixel then your mentioned bitrate is 130000*8=1M bits per second which is reasonable bitrate but of rather low picture quality.

Can you please be more specific with the unit of your figures? Where do you see your figures?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I attached photos above from my software when I posted earlier so you can see exactly what I am seeing.
 
Thanks Razer, I appreciate that. It looks like that won't be a problem for me on my LAN.
 
Those are some unexpected numbers, Razer. 4MP should require no more than double the bit rate of 2MP to achieve the desired image quality. Is your software re-encoding the streams? Or are you using VBR encoding and finding that the 4MP cam settles on a much higher bit rate than a 2MP cam?
 
Those are some unexpected numbers, Razer. 4MP should require no more than double the bit rate of 2MP to achieve the desired image quality. Is your software re-encoding the streams? Or are you using VBR encoding and finding that the 4MP cam settles on a much higher bit rate than a 2MP cam?

The cameras are set to default settings on the streams, so variable at medium. For the photos I'm attaching below I was set to variable up a quality of "higher" and these were on a new 5.3.2 firmware from @milkisbad that I literally just got in my inbox. Now I'm going to share some cropped images, but it is better than sharing nothing. So many of my cameras are unshareable so I apologize for that, in this case I am going to be able to share as this is an area that is under construction and I'll crop out the building. Hope this helps a little bit, and sorry for not being able to share more.

OK, here is my cropped shot in 4mp mode with WDR off:

attachment.php


And here is the same shot 30 seconds later with WDR on and set to 7 (as a note moving the setting around does not seem to change this result, 100 looks the same as 7 to me)


attachment.php


Lastly here is the shot when set to 2mp mode and not 4mp. Looking at the entire image I actually prefer the 2mp image.

attachment.php


Hope these help, and you can see that WDR is working in reverse, it is darkining the bright areas, not lightening the dark areas lol. It looks like I tinted the lens of my camera when I turn on WDR! :D
 

Attachments

  • 4mpWDRoffEDIT.jpg
    4mpWDRoffEDIT.jpg
    1.6 MB · Views: 782
  • 4mpWDRonEDIT.jpg
    4mpWDRonEDIT.jpg
    971.7 KB · Views: 770
  • 2mpShotEDIT.jpg
    2mpShotEDIT.jpg
    872.2 KB · Views: 774
Last edited by a moderator:
@Razer The settings pictures you posted do not show the bitrate and compression quality settings of the video. The settings pictures you posted show only the image settings. Image and video settings are two different things usually displayed as separate menus in the HIK firmware.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Seems most of the new 4MP cameras can only do 20fps Vs 2MP running at 30fps, does anyone have a recording showing what the difference is between the two? I think I'd prefer 30fps over 20fps to smooth the video out and have a higher chance of capturing license plates.
 
Seems most of the new 4MP cameras can only do 20fps Vs 2MP running at 30fps, does anyone have a recording showing what the difference is between the two? I think I'd prefer 30fps over 20fps to smooth the video out and have a higher chance of capturing license plates.
There is very little benefit to 30fps over 15...20 will be more than enough..
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benji
Seems most of the new 4MP cameras can only do 20fps Vs 2MP running at 30fps, does anyone have a recording showing what the difference is between the two? I think I'd prefer 30fps over 20fps to smooth the video out and have a higher chance of capturing license plates.

I believe that -- when we first start out - most of us become fixated on running as close to 30fps as possible. However, I also believe that most learn that 5 or 10fps is good enough, especially when taking into account the reduced overhead. I know this was certainly true for me; letting of of the 20 to 30fps dream was difficult...but running 15 cameras with Blue Iris forced my hand and I soon realized that 5fps works superbly for my requirements.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benji
I believe that -- when we first start out - most of us become fixated on running as close to 30fps as possible. However, I also believe that most learn that 5 or 10fps is good enough, especially when taking into account the reduced overhead. I know this was certainly true for me; letting of of the 20 to 30fps dream was difficult...but running 15 cameras with Blue Iris forced my hand and I soon realized that 5fps works superbly for my requirements.

I guess I was thinking about catching license plates where the higher frame rates makes it easier but I guess I'm thinking of the dashcam world.
 
If you use Sighthound to record your cameras the 30 fps seems to help the software correctly tag the motion as an object or a person.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Benji
I guess I was thinking about catching license plates where the higher frame rates makes it easier but I guess I'm thinking of the dashcam world.

You can set your 4MP cam to 1080p (2MP) resolution and record at 30 fps if you absolutely need that.
 
I guess I was thinking about catching license plates where the higher frame rates makes it easier but I guess I'm thinking of the dashcam world.
If you are doing lpr, you dont need 4mp...in fact most lpr cameras at 1mp or less. You can easily get a plate at 15fps...its a non issue.
 
If you are doing lpr, you dont need 4mp...in fact most lpr cameras at 1mp or less. You can easily get a plate at 15fps...its a non issue.

For my own information, would shutter speed matter more than fps?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: gwminor48
Hi olli, the camera with WiFi and SD slot should be DS-2CD2142FWD-IW. The S indicates Audio/Alarm IO. They do have SD slot.
 
Hi, thank you for your reply. I linked to DS-2CD2145F-I W S camera, I think it has both Wifi and SD slot.