Q™
IPCT Contributor
Go back to port of origin. They were foolish enough to sail at this uncertain time, they made a poor choice. Not our problem.
When did those passengers board that vessel for their pleasure cruise?
Go back to port of origin. They were foolish enough to sail at this uncertain time, they made a poor choice. Not our problem.
We have them refusing to leave ports, and anchored on borders of International Waters, at locations around Australia. On the surface this poses risk of becoming an unreasonable burden on our medical system. The ships are foreign, as are the crew... "so go home".What is your opinion on whether or not cruise ships should be allowed to dock /snip/ some with primarily foreign nationals.
We have them refusing to leave ports, and anchored on borders of International Waters, at locations around Australia. On the surface this poses risk of becoming an unreasonable burden on our medical system. The ships are foreign, as are the crew... "so go home".
Unfortunately if they set off and crew members become critically ill... likely given rates of infection on board... they will be out of range of decent medical assistance. If not, "our" costs of renderering assistance in accordance with international obligations could be significantly more expensive.
I believe that them remaining in proximity might actually be the lesser of two evils.
Cruise tourism has contributed to our economies, and as such vessels deserve safe haven if returning to home port is an excessive risk. I hope no deaths occur on those vessels which abided instructions to leave.
However it's neither. It is an international disaster.All's fair in love and war.
My view:What is your opinion on whether or not cruise ships should be allowed to dock in the USA some with primarily foreign nationals.
I would think it would make sense to have these ships do one of the following:
- Return to the port of origin of the cruise
- Go to the country the ship is registered
I don't think it's fair for the ships to head to the USA as a haven. I believe Americans on board should be repatriated to the USA but be tested and quarantined at a appropriate site per the test results. Foreign nationals not already in this country should not be allowed here until further notice.
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis to accept state residents off Holland America cruise ships
Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis to accept state residents off Zaandam cruise ship, but other passengers, including foreign nationals, remain in limbo.amp.usatoday.com
However it's neither. It is an international disaster.
My view:
-Legal US residents evacuated and quarantined / given appropriate medical care / eventually released to go home
-Anyone else needing urgent care evacuated / quarantined / given appropriate care / eventually assisted in returning to their country
-Non-critical but symptomatic persons: given option to return to their country of origin if possible (via arranged medical flights), otherwise evacuated / quarantined / cared for (there are multiple sites around US for this) / eventual return
-Non-symptomatic passengers: assist them arranging return to their countries, after which they should self-quarantine/isolate
-Ship / non-symptomatic crew: sail to country of registry or standard port of origin
I don't ascribe to the "not our problem" view. This is a world problem and requires cooperative and compassionate approach. Resources for what I describe are a drop in the bucket.
I read a news that all US at public places have to wear masks, maybe this is a rumor?
...
However it's neither. It is an international disaster.
My view:
-Legal US residents evacuated and quarantined / given appropriate medical care / eventually released to go home
-Anyone else needing urgent care evacuated / quarantined / given appropriate care / eventually assisted in returning to their country
-Non-critical but symptomatic persons: given option to return to their country of origin if possible (via arranged medical flights), otherwise evacuated / quarantined / cared for (there are multiple sites around US for this) / eventual return
-Non-symptomatic passengers: assist them arranging return to their countries, after which they should self-quarantine/isolate
-Ship / non-symptomatic crew: sail to country of registry or standard port of origin
I don't ascribe to the "not our problem" view. This is a world problem and requires cooperative and compassionate approach. Resources for what I describe are a drop in the bucket.
My view:
-Legal US residents evacuated and quarantined / given appropriate medical care / eventually released to go home
-Anyone else needing urgent care evacuated / quarantined / given appropriate care / eventually assisted in returning to their country
-Non-critical but symptomatic persons: given option to return to their country of origin if possible (via arranged medical flights), otherwise evacuated / quarantined / cared for (there are multiple sites around US for this) / eventual return
-Non-symptomatic passengers: assist them arranging return to their countries, after which they should self-quarantine/isolate
-Ship / non-symptomatic crew: sail to country of registry or standard port of origin
I don't ascribe to the "not our problem" view. This is a world problem and requires cooperative and compassionate approach. Resources for what I describe are a drop in the bucket.
Ok I’ll admit that was harsh and that your outline of action is most appropriate.
But if they boarded after the other known cruise ship fiascos were well publicized and recently from some port in S America as I assumed (maybe bad assumptions) at minimum it’s yet another case of “my lack of being responsible for my own actions and disregard of common sense and putting others in a bad spot is now your problem” wears thin on me.
We have enough of that mentality here already.