I think he outplayed the left today by asking if the election should be delayed. Now the left will fight to the death to see that it happens on schedule. Not because it's right or wrong, but because they're bots that are programmed to oppose the bad orange man.Remind me when the president has ”outplayed“ anyone?
We should already be well past this with our economy booming back like most of Europe is on track to do. Sigh.
Humans think they can predict or even change the climate on this plant. That's funny. There is so much we don't understand. We are tracking data from the last couple hundred years from a 4 billion year old planet. Would you think the pandemic was over if there were no reported cases in a 4 hour period today? Science. Can't have it both ways.I could perhaps take global warming seriously is the people preaching it practiced what they preached. You hear people like Gore, Obama, and the hollywoods telling the rest of us what to do while they heat and cool their mansions and fly around in private jets. They warn us that sea levels are rising while buying mansions on the beach. In so many ways the political left tells us what we have to do to avert a crisis while they do just the opposite for themselves.
You're right that no president could get it all right and nobody wants to be in the hot seat in such a crisis.
But here are a few things I think ANY democrat would have done better, that would have improved the US response:
1. Not reorganize the US pandemic response team in 2018 to save costs. This screwed us up royally this year.
Humans think they can predict or even change the climate on this plant. That's funny. There is so much we don't understand. We are tracking data from the last couple hundred years from a 4 billion year old planet. Would you think the pandemic was over if there were no reported cases in a 4 hour period today? Science. Can't have it both ways.
Doesn't matter, we've only got 12 years left anyway.
I was making a comparison. We have very limited data of Earth's climate. Maybe a century and a half's worth, as accurate instruments are a fairly recent discovery. Yet, many scientists seem to be ok with using this very thin slice of data to make assumptions on the status of our climate.Please clarify how the Pandemic and Climate change are related, as I certainly see no immediate relationship.
I was making a comparison. We have very limited data of Earth's climate. Maybe a century and a half's worth, as accurate instruments are a fairly recent discovery. Yet, many scientists seem to be ok with using this very thin slice of data to make assumptions on the status of our climate.
My point was that it would be similar for a scientist to take a thin slice of pandemic infection data (say a few hours), and use that data to assume the status of the pandemic.
It doesn't work. We've all seen the graphs, flattening the curve, etc.
We don't have an accurate graph of the earths climate from 1000 years ago. Or a million, or a billion, regardless of what they say core samples infer. They are not that accurate, and are cherry picked.
Sorry, got off topic on that one.
Haven't read an apolitical analysis stating that the reorg caused harm to response. Tim Morrison's article is interesting read:
"...Defense Secretary Robert Gates, congressional oversight committees and members of the Obama administration itself all agreed the NSC was too large and too operationally focused (a departure from its traditional role coordinating executive branch activity)...:
The previous administration failure to re-supply emergency PPE stock pile, even though funds were provided to do so, as noted in the USA Today fact check, didn't help the response.
No, the White House Didn’t ‘Dissolve’ Its Pandemic Response Office | RealClearPolitics
President Trump gets his share of criticism some warranted, much not. But recently the presidents critics have chosen curious ground to question his response to the coronavirus outbreak since...www.realclearpolitics.com
Fact check: Did the Obama administration deplete the federal stockpile of N95 masks?
During the presidency of Barack Obama, the national stockpile was seriously taxed as the administration addressed multiple crises over eight years.www.usatoday.com
F#$K! Here we go again
View attachment 67659
NYS is probably actually at that record low now. However, Georgia crowed about record lows too, and look where they are a month or so later...Can we Trust Cuomo on the recent statistics for New York State? Keeps touting that we're at a record low.
NYS is probably actually at that record low now. However, Georgia crowed about record lows too, and look where they are a month or so later...
OF course, if you go to NYS right now you have to quarantine for two weeks, right?
I have heard that Chicago plans on ticketing for infractions. But you are right. How do they know?Yes @Frankenscript that is correct. However, again, how realistic is it to enforce this "quarantine"?
I've seen plates from just about all of the current hotspots (i.e. California, Arizona, Texas, Georgia, Alabama, Florida, South Carolina, North Carolina, etc.) I've come across them all while driving
I was making a comparison. We have very limited data of Earth's climate. Maybe a century and a half's worth, as accurate instruments are a fairly recent discovery. Yet, many scientists seem to be ok with using this very thin slice of data to make assumptions on the status of our climate.
My point was that it would be similar for a scientist to take a thin slice of pandemic infection data (say a few hours), and use that data to assume the status of the pandemic.
It doesn't work. We've all seen the graphs, flattening the curve, etc.
We don't have an accurate graph of the earths climate from 1000 years ago. Or a million, or a billion, regardless of what they say core samples infer. They are not that accurate, and are cherry picked.
Sorry, got off topic on that one.
I agree there when it comes to the pandemic. Thats why I made mention of all the graphs of flattening the curve. The science definitely has the data in this case.I don't recall any scientists being ignorant of data sampling and potential issues with statistics.