Review - TOP-201 Super Mini 720P HD IP-Cam (The Cheapest IP Cam So Far !!)

Could this be done through the Dev/SDK tools available for the chipset?
(something i'm new to, and keen wrap my mind around)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Could not agree more. It should be noted that the Hi3518E SoC chipset which this IP Camera is based on. Natively supports this feature. But the Manufacturer needs to place the CGI hooks in their firmware, to access it using a URL.

Which is why I really am pressing the manufacturer to add this logic in a future firmware release.

The camera does support snapshots today. It just requires the use of an IE ("Internet Explorer") browser and the ActiveX plugin or the CMS for the IP Camera. Which is using the plugin not a URL to grab the snapshot from the IP Camera.

Don

Thank you for your hard work. Let's hope that the manufacturer will hear their clients.
 
Just received my TOP-201 today (30 business day later..) and I'm having difficulty finding it on the network.

The "IP Search" feature in CMS turns up nothing and by default the IP is supposed to be 192.168.1.10 is what is says on the back. Not sure if I have a lemon or this thing is more of challenge than I thought.

Can someone help me get it up and running? I've downloaded the manual and docs and followed them but not getting far.
 
For ONVIF-compatible cameras - such as the TOP-201, the Windows open-source tool 'ONVIF Device Manager' from sourceforge.net does a pretty good job of finding what's on your LAN. As well as providing loads of useful info on the cameras and NVRs.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TL1096r
Is there a PoE version of this camera?

There is 'the long and short' answer, so I'll aim for the middle and hope for the bullseye!

There's a range of module boards that are built on the Hi3518x chipset which are used in the variants of this camera.
This is the board that came in the specific model I purchased in this review:

attachment.php

I have indicated the pins that are assigned to POE.

Basically, the board DOES support POE, but most likely to keep cost down it has not been utilized. Which is still great news if you're willing to open up the cam and connect it up!

The range of module board configurations built on top of the four versions of the Hi3518 chipset, come with various interface terminals. Some allowing more peripheral connection than others. The board in the TOP-201 is not as 'optioned' compared to some others available. I recently purchased another variation of this camera which has this board below.

attachment.php


...as you can see, it offers a fair bit more in the way of adaptability. I was happy with this one because I want to hook a mic up to it for added audio stream.

Further to the POE question, there is a few versions I have come across with POE connection, ready connected for sale.

attachment.php


http://epsee.en.alibaba.com/product..._security_poe_pinhole_ip_camera_peephole.html

http://www.alibaba.com/product-detail/1-3-Megapixel-Onvif-Poe-Mini_1571409526.html

Above are just two of the models available that are POE ready. Many more variations of module boards with different combinations of pre-built peripherals can easily be found, leaving a lot to the imagination depending on desired use and finding the right price... have a look at the source below:

http://s.click.aliexpress.com/e/QmB7anA

Cheers!
 

Attachments

  • Hi3518-CCTV-IP-camera4.jpg
    Hi3518-CCTV-IP-camera4.jpg
    150.5 KB · Views: 804
  • file.jpg
    file.jpg
    60.7 KB · Views: 954
  • poe.jpg
    poe.jpg
    143.9 KB · Views: 639
Last edited by a moderator:
  • Like
Reactions: zeoclang
Just want to say thanks for your work and info.
Bought a 1080p camera, http://detail.tmall.com/item.htm?id=14186881008&spm=a1z09.2.9.42.NicY0r&_u=m1in819pda48 and tried to get snapshots from it.
Read this site, arrived at the assumption that it does not have built in support (until I ask them, they are on Chinese New Year vacation), and by looking further found that u can use avconv or ffmpeg.
To get a snapshot (can replace "avconv" with "ffmpeg") ;
[FONT=Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif]avconv-irtsp://192.168.1.10:554//user=admin_password=_channel=1_stream=0.sdp-vframes 1 -r 1 -s 640x360 pic.jpg
(exclude "-s 640x360" and u get original picture size.
Tested on Ubuntu 14.10.[/FONT]
 
Just want to say thanks for your work and info.
Bought a 1080p camera, http://detail.tmall.com/item.htm?id=14186881008&spm=a1z09.2.9.42.NicY0r&_u=m1in819pda48 and tried to get snapshots from it.
Read this site, arrived at the assumption that it does not have built in support (until I ask them, they are on Chinese New Year vacation), and by looking further found that u can use avconv or ffmpeg.
To get a snapshot (can replace "avconv" with "ffmpeg") ;
avconv-irtsp://192.168.1.10:554//user=admin_password=_channel=1_stream=0.sdp-vframes 1 -r 1 -s 640x360 pic.jpg
(exclude "-s 640x360" and u get original picture size.
Tested on Ubuntu 14.10.

You're very welcome Marc
and thanks for sharing the info, I'll try it out! ...madmas and TheUberOverLord will be pleased.

Cheers!
 
I purchase one of these because it is the first hd pinhole cam I have seen that is an IP camera. I noticed you mentioned software on the enclosed disk and mine did not install either, and you mentioned your setup on you network with two subnets. I have a similar setup. May I enquire the url of the software you used to find the cam on your network.
Second is this really on 192.168.1.10
I was not able to find the cam typing this in directly, may have been the subnet I was accessing it from?
Would you share what you did to find and configure the TOP-201 cam on your network, The would be a great help as the documentation is in chinese and I am not having very much luck getting this to work.
Your help would be greatly appreciated.
Oh by the way an outstanding review on this product.
 
I purchase one of these because it is the first hd pinhole cam I have seen that is an IP camera. I noticed you mentioned software on the enclosed disk and mine did not install either, and you mentioned your setup on you network with two subnets. I have a similar setup. May I enquire the url of the software you used to find the cam on your network.
Second is this really on 192.168.1.10
I was not able to find the cam typing this in directly, may have been the subnet I was accessing it from?
Would you share what you did to find and configure the TOP-201 cam on your network, The would be a great help as the documentation is in chinese and I am not having very much luck getting this to work.


Hi IRONSIDE,
I recorded a short video going through the basic setup and uploaded it to Youtube. Check the source at the following post:

http://www.ipcamtalk.com/showthread.php?1812-Review-TOP-201-Super-Mini-720P-HD-IP-Cam-(The-Cheapest-IP-Cam-So-Far-!!)&p=17539&viewfull=1#post17539

Your help would be greatly appreciated.
Oh by the way an outstanding review on this product.

You're very welcome! ...let us know how you go after the previous suggestions and if you're still having any trouble with it :)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Please make sure the DC Power adapter you are using is good and that it's seated in the cameras power connector. It should be 12V DC 1-2 Amps. I use a 12V DC 2 Amp DC power supply. Runs somewhat hot but works.

Can you swap Ethernet cables and see if you have a bad Ethernet cable?

If possible try and plug the IP Camera into the Router/AP that the system you are using is communicating with. With no bridges/switches or wireless extenders in between the IP Camera or the System trying to find the IP Camera.

Also. You may want to download the device manager for this IP Camera. Link can be found here and try seeing if it can find the IP Camera:

http://www.ipcamtalk.com/showthread...P-Cam-So-Far-!!)&p=19499&viewfull=1#post19499

Don

Well looks like the power supply was the culprit. It's a 12V DC 1 Amp DC power supply but the connector was not seated properly.

To make sure it's working properly I also used the CMS software (thanks for the link) and it found the camera right away. Now that I know it's working, should I upgrade the firmware to the latest and greatest? I will follow the in depth post you made about it if you recommend doing it. Thanks for taking the time to write that up!

For ONVIF-compatible cameras - such as the TOP-201, the Windows open-source tool 'ONVIF Device Manager' from sourceforge.net does a pretty good job of finding what's on your LAN. As well as providing loads of useful info on the cameras and NVRs.

Great info! I'm not a fan of the software so far and for a basic task like this, seems like the perfect utility to have in the arsenal. Plus I'm not sure what other "goodies" come with a CMS installation that I might not have asked for.
 
Agreed, ODM deserves its place in the toolkit. Tells you things you need that the manufacturer doesn't bother to.
Another smart piece of Russian software...
 
Something else that I would suggest is that you block outbound traffic from this camera to the internet at your firewall. I don't have a capture available now, but when I put this thing on my network it was pretty chatty outbound. I just made a rule to deny outbound traffic and left it at that, but it is something to think about when connecting devices to your networks.
 
I stumbled on this thread. The cam for $19 looks great, but just wonder what would be good uses for it. Also, I see bunch of variations of this cam and having hard time to decide on which one to get. I prefer to have all features (either poe or wifi and ideally varifocal), but if it uses different firmware or older chipset I would rather not.

Original, 720p ($18)
http://www.aliexpress.com/store/pro...a-1-0-Megapixel-66966/713545_32259244980.html

720p, wifi, mic ($43) <- Not sure what chipset it uses, but seems like the best deal
http://www.aliexpress.com/item/Free...curity-system-audio-home-door/2029403787.html

720p, ir ($65)
http://www.aliexpress.com/item/Free...1-3-Mega-pixel-Hd-Mini-Hidden/1529023252.html

720p, wifi, ir ($56)
http://www.aliexpress.com/item/New-...P-Hidden-Mini-IR-Wireless-Ip/32218734989.html

1080p, varifocal (55
http://www.aliexpress.com/item/1080...-varifocal-zoom-lens-With-P2P/2021156569.html

1080p, ir ($84)
http://www.aliexpress.com/item/Tiny...-Vision-2-1Megapixel-1080P-Hd/2025254570.html

1080p poe, ir ($92)
http://www.aliexpress.com/store/pro...MEGAPIXEL-10Pcs-940nm/1034208_1706672769.html

720p, wireless ($44)
http://www.aliexpress.com/item/New-...Lens-H-264-Onvif-Indoor-MINI/32237418619.html

Advertising Sony IMX122 sensor. Similar design, but pinhole option only:

1080p, microphone ($80) ()
http://www.aliexpress.com/store/pro...-2-Megapixel-Pinhole/1034208_32276081190.html


1080p, wifi, poe? ($100)
http://www.aliexpress.com/store/pro...rld-Smallest-Wireless/412419_32238088046.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I also have one of these, plus one of the fixed lens types. My plan is to use them for indoor locations where the space is very small and/or where I do not want the camera to be easily seen. They seem perfect for that, plus they are so cheap and have excellent images.
 
attachment.php
attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • s1.jpg
    s1.jpg
    197.7 KB · Views: 656
  • s2.jpg
    s2.jpg
    187.6 KB · Views: 725
I don't think I will ever use this because of the horrible WDR I am getting from it. The attached image is in a basement and is completely blown out by the exterior light coming in the windows. I initially thought I would use it in an interior application somewhere in the house, maybe hidden on a bookshelf. The WDR performance I am seeing with the camera almost makes that worthless as light transitions throughout the day.

It is a decent picture for the ~$25 I have in it, but the picture color issues, WDR issues, and the necessity to use that awful software to manage the device lead me to believe the additional $60-80 for a 3MP Hik bullet will work better in almost every situation.

They are a neat novelty, but that is about it. I wouldn't recommend them to anyone unless they just wanted something to tinker with for a weekend.



attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • 2-25-2015 4-02-20 PM.jpg
    2-25-2015 4-02-20 PM.jpg
    41.1 KB · Views: 644
I don't think I will ever use this because of the horrible WDR I am getting from it. The attached image is in a basement and is completely blown out by the exterior light coming in the windows. I initially thought I would use it in an interior application somewhere in the house, maybe hidden on a bookshelf. The WDR performance I am seeing with the camera almost makes that worthless as light transitions throughout the day.

It is a decent picture for the ~$25 I have in it, but the picture color issues, WDR issues, and the necessity to use that awful software to manage the device lead me to believe the additional $60-80 for a 3MP Hik bullet will work better in almost every situation.

They are a neat novelty, but that is about it. I wouldn't recommend them to anyone unless they just wanted something to tinker with for a weekend.



attachment.php

Thank you for your input, saved me a few bucks from an impulse buy :)


I'll wait for next gen of these. I agree though, Hiks for $80 are just better value and more usable. They even offer tiny cam option, although 8x the price of this one.
 
I don't think I will ever use this because of the horrible WDR I am getting from it. The attached image is in a basement and is completely blown out by the exterior light coming in the windows. I initially thought I would use it in an interior application somewhere in the house, maybe hidden on a bookshelf. The WDR performance I am seeing with the camera almost makes that worthless as light transitions throughout the day.

It is a decent picture for the ~$25 I have in it, but the picture color issues, WDR issues, and the necessity to use that awful software to manage the device lead me to believe the additional $60-80 for a 3MP Hik bullet will work better in almost every situation.

They are a neat novelty, but that is about it. I wouldn't recommend them to anyone unless they just wanted something to tinker with for a weekend.

That is a pretty bad image. I wouldn't advise camera's of this quality to be used for any serious application where the image may be relied on. Although in my experience with two different versions of this camera, they well exceeded my expectations and perform very well.

I have tested them in a range of lighting situations but have not experienced image quality as poor as what you have shown, even using the default camera parameters. Did you try changing the settings from the default at all to work with the lighting conditions?

attachment.php
 

Attachments

  • Top-201CameraParams.jpg
    Top-201CameraParams.jpg
    44.7 KB · Views: 591