Frankenscript
Known around here
- Dec 21, 2017
- 1,288
- 1,201
Hit job on Fauci, presumably to plug a book. Filled with errors. One of them, talking about HQ, referenced a Sermo survey from late March about doctors' opinions about which treatment they expected to be most effective. At the time of the survey, HQ was all the buzz. More doctors said they thought HQ was the most effective treatment, than any other treatment option surveyed. But the survey didn't actually reference any patient results, just doctors' opinions about what they thought was going to work. Look at the data. 37% said HQ was the most effective. 32% said either "Azithromycin" or "nothing." Again, this is opinions, not data about outcomes. Anyway the next edition of the survey saw HQ plummet in doctor popularity as their ongoing work failed to show valid signals.
The woman then goes on to spout a theory about prophylactic use of HQ that has never been demonstrated in any decent study, either in the US or abroad where HQ is not at all political. A guy on the video challenges "will Fauci's vaccine go through double blind placebo controlled trials?" assuming that it wouldn't be. Yes, any mass-utilization vaccine will go through such trials... I work for a company that does that trial work. The vaccines aren't Fauci's, by the way...
The video is an interesting mishmash of fact, fiction, and bald-faced fabrication.